Comparison Overview

Cap Sciences

VS

Chicago Architecture Center

Cap Sciences

Esplanade du Professeur Tournesol, Bordeaux, 33300, FR
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

Au cœur de la métropole bordelaise, Cap Sciences offre au public un lieu pour explorer les sciences et les techniques : expositions, animations, manifestations. En Aquitaine et au-delà, Cap Sciences propose un catalogue d'expositions itinérantes, d'ateliers découverte, de mallettes pédagogiques et d'animations ludiques. Concevoir et réaliser des productions et des manifestations culturelles, accompagner des projets éducatifs, accueillir et animer, éditer et diffuser, autant de savoir-faire que Cap Sciences met au service de ses partenaires. Cap Sciences est situé sur les quais de Bordeaux, au bord du fleuve dans un bâtiment moderne conçu pour accueillir les visiteurs et organiser des événements et séminaires.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 98
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Chicago Architecture Center

111 E Wacker Dr, Chicago, 60601, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23

When you hit the pavement on one of our 75+ walking tours through Chicago neighborhoods, embark on our award-winning river cruise or visit the stunning riverfront Center, you’re helping fund youth education initiatives, world-renowned events like Open House Chicago and public information campaigns that empower citizens to take an active role in the future of their cities. As a certified nonprofit, all CAC ticket purchases directly support our education efforts and community engagement projects.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 132
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cap-sciences.jpeg
Cap Sciences
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chicago-architecture-center.jpeg
Chicago Architecture Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cap Sciences
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Chicago Architecture Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cap Sciences in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chicago Architecture Center in 2026.

Incident History — Cap Sciences (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cap Sciences cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Chicago Architecture Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chicago Architecture Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cap-sciences.jpeg
Cap Sciences
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chicago-architecture-center.jpeg
Chicago Architecture Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Cap Sciences company and Chicago Architecture Center company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Chicago Architecture Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cap Sciences company.

In the current year, Chicago Architecture Center company and Cap Sciences company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Chicago Architecture Center company nor Cap Sciences company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Chicago Architecture Center company nor Cap Sciences company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Chicago Architecture Center company nor Cap Sciences company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cap Sciences company nor Chicago Architecture Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cap Sciences nor Chicago Architecture Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cap Sciences company nor Chicago Architecture Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Chicago Architecture Center company employs more people globally than Cap Sciences company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Cap Sciences nor Chicago Architecture Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cap Sciences nor Chicago Architecture Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cap Sciences nor Chicago Architecture Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cap Sciences nor Chicago Architecture Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cap Sciences nor Chicago Architecture Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cap Sciences nor Chicago Architecture Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

The WP Go Maps (formerly WP Google Maps) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the processBackgroundAction() function in all versions up to, and including, 10.0.04. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to modify global map engine settings.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The Save as PDF Plugin by PDFCrowd plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘options’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. NOTE: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires that the PDFCrowd API key is blank (also known as "demo mode", which is the default configuration when the plugin is installed) or known.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Hustle – Email Marketing, Lead Generation, Optins, Popups plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to incorrect file type validation in the action_import_module() function in all versions up to, and including, 7.8.9.2. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with a lower-privileged role (e.g., Subscriber-level access and above), to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible. Successful exploitation requires an admin to grant Hustle module permissions (or module edit access) to the low-privileged user so they can access the Hustle admin page and obtain the required nonce.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

The WP Directory Kit plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.9 via the wdk_public_action AJAX handler. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract email addresses for users with Directory Kit-specific user roles.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Meta-box GalleryMeta plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via admin settings in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with editor-level permissions and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This only affects multi-site installations and installations where unfiltered_html has been disabled.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N