Comparison Overview

Canyon Vista Recovery Center

VS

Trauma Support Services

Canyon Vista Recovery Center

860 North Center Street, Mesa, 85201, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://canyonvista.com/

Canyon Vista Recovery Center is a mental health and substance use disorder program for adult men and women located in beautiful Mesa, Arizona. At Canyon Vista, our clients start to address all aspects of their recovery and gain the self-respect and acceptance needed to start a new life. With the support of our structured environment, clients gain the ability to prioritize social, emotional, and physical issues.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Trauma Support Services

11882 Greenville Ave, Dallas, Texas, 75243, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://TraumaSupportServices.org

The mission of Trauma Support Services of North Texas (TSSNT) is to provide personalized, compassionate care for those affected by trauma. We provide trauma-informed therapy and services to victims of crime and other forms of trauma at NO COST. Our training institute also provides free education in trauma counseling to licensed professionals. Understanding that survivors of psychological trauma often require long-term therapy, TSSNT's motto is to do “Whatever it takes, for as long as it takes” for our clients to function well at home, work, school, or play.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/canyon-vista-recovery-center.jpeg
Canyon Vista Recovery Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trauma-support-services-of-north-texas.jpeg
Trauma Support Services
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Canyon Vista Recovery Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Trauma Support Services
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Canyon Vista Recovery Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Trauma Support Services in 2026.

Incident History — Canyon Vista Recovery Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Canyon Vista Recovery Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Trauma Support Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Trauma Support Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/canyon-vista-recovery-center.jpeg
Canyon Vista Recovery Center
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access to Email Accounts
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trauma-support-services-of-north-texas.jpeg
Trauma Support Services
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Canyon Vista Recovery Center company and Trauma Support Services company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Canyon Vista Recovery Center company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Trauma Support Services company has not reported any.

In the current year, Trauma Support Services company and Canyon Vista Recovery Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Trauma Support Services company nor Canyon Vista Recovery Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Canyon Vista Recovery Center company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Trauma Support Services company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Trauma Support Services company nor Canyon Vista Recovery Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Canyon Vista Recovery Center company nor Trauma Support Services company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Canyon Vista Recovery Center nor Trauma Support Services holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Canyon Vista Recovery Center company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Trauma Support Services company.

Canyon Vista Recovery Center company employs more people globally than Trauma Support Services company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Canyon Vista Recovery Center nor Trauma Support Services holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Canyon Vista Recovery Center nor Trauma Support Services holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Canyon Vista Recovery Center nor Trauma Support Services holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Canyon Vista Recovery Center nor Trauma Support Services holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Canyon Vista Recovery Center nor Trauma Support Services holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Canyon Vista Recovery Center nor Trauma Support Services holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References