Comparison Overview

Canyon Vista Recovery Center

VS

The Fountain Hill Center

Canyon Vista Recovery Center

860 North Center Street, Mesa, 85201, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://canyonvista.com/

Canyon Vista Recovery Center is a mental health and substance use disorder program for adult men and women located in beautiful Mesa, Arizona. At Canyon Vista, our clients start to address all aspects of their recovery and gain the self-respect and acceptance needed to start a new life. With the support of our structured environment, clients gain the ability to prioritize social, emotional, and physical issues.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

The Fountain Hill Center

534 Fountain St NE, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49503, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fountainhillcenter.org

The Fountain Hill Center is a nonprofit collective of over a dozen licensed, independent therapists. We seek to provide pathways to healing and transformation, both personal and relational, through innovative therapeutic, educational, evaluative, and consultative services. We maintain two counseling offices, one in Grand Rapids, MI, which opened in 1975, and one in New Era, MI, which opened in 2002. In addition to providing individual counseling for children, adolescents, and adults, we also offer couples and family counseling, group counseling, and court-related and professional services. Learn more at www.fountainhillcenter.org.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/canyon-vista-recovery-center.jpeg
Canyon Vista Recovery Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-fountain-hill-center.jpeg
The Fountain Hill Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Canyon Vista Recovery Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Fountain Hill Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Canyon Vista Recovery Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Fountain Hill Center in 2026.

Incident History — Canyon Vista Recovery Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Canyon Vista Recovery Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Fountain Hill Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Fountain Hill Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/canyon-vista-recovery-center.jpeg
Canyon Vista Recovery Center
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access to Email Accounts
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-fountain-hill-center.jpeg
The Fountain Hill Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Fountain Hill Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Canyon Vista Recovery Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Canyon Vista Recovery Center company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas The Fountain Hill Center company has not reported any.

In the current year, The Fountain Hill Center company and Canyon Vista Recovery Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Fountain Hill Center company nor Canyon Vista Recovery Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Canyon Vista Recovery Center company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other The Fountain Hill Center company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither The Fountain Hill Center company nor Canyon Vista Recovery Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Canyon Vista Recovery Center company nor The Fountain Hill Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Canyon Vista Recovery Center nor The Fountain Hill Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Canyon Vista Recovery Center company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to The Fountain Hill Center company.

The Fountain Hill Center company employs more people globally than Canyon Vista Recovery Center company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Canyon Vista Recovery Center nor The Fountain Hill Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Canyon Vista Recovery Center nor The Fountain Hill Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Canyon Vista Recovery Center nor The Fountain Hill Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Canyon Vista Recovery Center nor The Fountain Hill Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Canyon Vista Recovery Center nor The Fountain Hill Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Canyon Vista Recovery Center nor The Fountain Hill Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References