Comparison Overview

CANYON ISD

VS

Prince George's County Public Schools

CANYON ISD

3301 N 23rd St, Canyon, Texas, 79015, US
Last Update: 2025-03-08 (UTC)
Between 750 and 799

The Canyon Independent School District serves two communities, Canyon and Amarillo, in Randall County of the Texas Panhandle. The district covers a large area, which encompasses 732 square miles. The north end of the district has 8 campuses in south Amarillo that offer immediate access to city amenities, while those in the city of Canyon offer a small-town atmosphere with easy access to the city. In the city of Canyon there are 5 campuses, and 2 campuses are located in between the two cities. The Canyon ISD community is well known for its commitment to children and education. Within district attendance boundaries, new homes and new neighborhoods abound. Many new families move into the Canyon ISD attendance area because of the reputation of the schools and the quality of life found here. The school district is a learning community, providing opportunities for all students and staff to reach their learning potentials.

NAICS: 611
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 476
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Prince George's County Public Schools

14201 School Lane, None, Upper Marlboro, MD, US, 20772
Last Update: 2025-07-26 (UTC)
Between 700 and 749

Prince George's County Public Schools (PGCPS), one of the nation's 25 largest school districts, has 200 schools and centers, more than 133,000 students and 22,000 employees. The school system serves a diverse student population from urban, suburban and rural communities located in the Washington, DC suburbs. PGCPS is nationally recognized for innovative programs and initiatives that provide students with unique learning opportunities, including arts integration, environmental and financial literacy, and language immersion.

NAICS: 6111
NAICS Definition: Elementary and Secondary Schools
Employees: 13,087
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/canyon-isd.jpeg
CANYON ISD
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pgcps.jpeg
Prince George's County Public Schools
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CANYON ISD
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Prince George's County Public Schools
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CANYON ISD in 2025.

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Prince George's County Public Schools in 2025.

Incident History — CANYON ISD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CANYON ISD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Prince George's County Public Schools (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Prince George's County Public Schools cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/canyon-isd.jpeg
CANYON ISD
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pgcps.jpeg
Prince George's County Public Schools
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 08/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 08/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

CANYON ISD company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Prince George's County Public Schools company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Prince George's County Public Schools company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas CANYON ISD company has not reported any.

In the current year, Prince George's County Public Schools company and CANYON ISD company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Prince George's County Public Schools company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while CANYON ISD company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Prince George's County Public Schools company has disclosed at least one data breach, while CANYON ISD company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Prince George's County Public Schools company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while CANYON ISD company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither CANYON ISD company nor Prince George's County Public Schools company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CANYON ISD nor Prince George's County Public Schools holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CANYON ISD company nor Prince George's County Public Schools company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Prince George's County Public Schools company employs more people globally than CANYON ISD company, reflecting its scale as a Primary and Secondary Education.

Neither CANYON ISD nor Prince George's County Public Schools holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CANYON ISD nor Prince George's County Public Schools holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CANYON ISD nor Prince George's County Public Schools holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CANYON ISD nor Prince George's County Public Schools holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CANYON ISD nor Prince George's County Public Schools holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CANYON ISD nor Prince George's County Public Schools holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sakai is a Collaboration and Learning Environment. Prior to versions 23.5 and 25.0, EncryptionUtilityServiceImpl initialized an AES256TextEncryptor password (serverSecretKey) using RandomStringUtils with the default java.util.Random. java.util.Random is a non‑cryptographic PRNG and can be predicted from limited state/seed information (e.g., start time window), substantially reducing the effective search space of the generated key. An attacker who can obtain ciphertexts (e.g., exported or at‑rest strings protected by this service) and approximate the PRNG seed can feasibly reconstruct the serverSecretKey and decrypt affected data. SAK-49866 is patched in Sakai 23.5, 25.0, and trunk.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.6
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

pypdf is a free and open-source pure-python PDF library. Prior to version 6.1.3, an attacker who uses this vulnerability can craft a PDF which leads to large memory usage. This requires parsing the content stream of a page using the LZWDecode filter. This has been fixed in pypdf version 6.1.3.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

pypdf is a free and open-source pure-python PDF library. Prior to version 6.1.3, an attacker who uses this vulnerability can craft a PDF which leads to an infinite loop. This requires parsing the content stream of a page which has an inline image using the DCTDecode filter. This has been fixed in pypdf version 6.1.3.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. Prior to version 1.6.5, Authlib’s JWE zip=DEF path performs unbounded DEFLATE decompression. A very small ciphertext can expand into tens or hundreds of megabytes on decrypt, allowing an attacker who can supply decryptable tokens to exhaust memory and CPU and cause denial of service. This issue has been patched in version 1.6.5. Workarounds for this issue involve rejecting or stripping zip=DEF for inbound JWEs at the application boundary, forking and add a bounded decompression guard via decompressobj().decompress(data, MAX_SIZE)) and returning an error when output exceeds a safe limit, or enforcing strict maximum token sizes and fail fast on oversized inputs; combine with rate limiting.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

OpenBao is an open source identity-based secrets management system. Prior to version 2.4.2, OpenBao's audit log did not appropriately redact fields when relevant subsystems sent []byte response parameters rather than strings. This includes, but is not limited to sys/raw with use of encoding=base64, all data would be emitted unredacted to the audit log, and Transit, when performing a signing operation with a derived Ed25519 key, would emit public keys to the audit log. This issue has been patched in OpenBao 2.4.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:P/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X