Comparison Overview

CANYON ISD

VS

Orange County Public Schools

CANYON ISD

3301 N 23rd St, Canyon, Texas, 79015, US
Last Update: 2025-03-08 (UTC)
Between 750 and 799

The Canyon Independent School District serves two communities, Canyon and Amarillo, in Randall County of the Texas Panhandle. The district covers a large area, which encompasses 732 square miles. The north end of the district has 8 campuses in south Amarillo that offer immediate access to city amenities, while those in the city of Canyon offer a small-town atmosphere with easy access to the city. In the city of Canyon there are 5 campuses, and 2 campuses are located in between the two cities. The Canyon ISD community is well known for its commitment to children and education. Within district attendance boundaries, new homes and new neighborhoods abound. Many new families move into the Canyon ISD attendance area because of the reputation of the schools and the quality of life found here. The school district is a learning community, providing opportunities for all students and staff to reach their learning potentials.

NAICS: 611
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 476
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Orange County Public Schools

445 W. Amelia St., Orlando, Florida, 32801, US
Last Update: 2025-03-04 (UTC)
Between 750 and 799

Orange County Public Schools is recognized as one of the top urban school districts in the nation – the 8th largest school district in America (4th in Florida) with 210 traditional schools, approximately 206,000 students and over 24,000 employees. OCPS students enjoy equity and access to a wide variety of educational opportunities, including magnet programs with specialized curriculum from Kindergarten to 12th grade. Offerings include aviation and aerospace, laser photonics, agriscience, theater and performing arts, International Baccalaureate, international studies, law and finance, engineering, science and technology, foreign language, criminal justice, medical technology, veterinary science and other specialties. OCPS is also known for encouraging students to pursue college credits through Advanced Placement courses. In fact, OCPS high school graduates pass AP exams at a higher rate than students in Massachusetts, the highest scoring state in America. Career and technical education programs are infused in middle and high school curriculum, where students can explore career options, earn industry certifications and even receive an AA degree when they graduate. Every year, more than 100 graduates from OCPS high schools are accepted into top-20 colleges and universities around the country, as well as U.S. service academies. The district also boasts a 97.9% graduate rate among its 20 traditional high schools. By 2020, every OCPS student had a laptop or digital device as a part of an aggressive and innovative digital learning program. The Center for Digital Education and National School Boards Association ranks OCPS among the top 10 on its annual Digital School Districts Survey. Currently, every secondary student has a laptop. OCPS celebrated its 150th anniversary in December 2019. Thanks to Orange County voters and taxpayers, 50 new schools have been built and more than 120 school construction projects completed since 2003.

NAICS: 6111
NAICS Definition: Elementary and Secondary Schools
Employees: 17,806
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/canyon-isd.jpeg
CANYON ISD
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/orange-county-public-schools.jpeg
Orange County Public Schools
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CANYON ISD
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Orange County Public Schools
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CANYON ISD in 2025.

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Orange County Public Schools in 2025.

Incident History — CANYON ISD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CANYON ISD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Orange County Public Schools (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Orange County Public Schools cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/canyon-isd.jpeg
CANYON ISD
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/orange-county-public-schools.jpeg
Orange County Public Schools
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Orange County Public Schools company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CANYON ISD company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Orange County Public Schools company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CANYON ISD company.

In the current year, Orange County Public Schools company and CANYON ISD company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Orange County Public Schools company nor CANYON ISD company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Orange County Public Schools company nor CANYON ISD company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Orange County Public Schools company nor CANYON ISD company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CANYON ISD company nor Orange County Public Schools company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CANYON ISD nor Orange County Public Schools holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CANYON ISD company nor Orange County Public Schools company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Orange County Public Schools company employs more people globally than CANYON ISD company, reflecting its scale as a Primary and Secondary Education.

Neither CANYON ISD nor Orange County Public Schools holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CANYON ISD nor Orange County Public Schools holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CANYON ISD nor Orange County Public Schools holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CANYON ISD nor Orange County Public Schools holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CANYON ISD nor Orange County Public Schools holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CANYON ISD nor Orange County Public Schools holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sakai is a Collaboration and Learning Environment. Prior to versions 23.5 and 25.0, EncryptionUtilityServiceImpl initialized an AES256TextEncryptor password (serverSecretKey) using RandomStringUtils with the default java.util.Random. java.util.Random is a non‑cryptographic PRNG and can be predicted from limited state/seed information (e.g., start time window), substantially reducing the effective search space of the generated key. An attacker who can obtain ciphertexts (e.g., exported or at‑rest strings protected by this service) and approximate the PRNG seed can feasibly reconstruct the serverSecretKey and decrypt affected data. SAK-49866 is patched in Sakai 23.5, 25.0, and trunk.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.6
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

pypdf is a free and open-source pure-python PDF library. Prior to version 6.1.3, an attacker who uses this vulnerability can craft a PDF which leads to large memory usage. This requires parsing the content stream of a page using the LZWDecode filter. This has been fixed in pypdf version 6.1.3.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

pypdf is a free and open-source pure-python PDF library. Prior to version 6.1.3, an attacker who uses this vulnerability can craft a PDF which leads to an infinite loop. This requires parsing the content stream of a page which has an inline image using the DCTDecode filter. This has been fixed in pypdf version 6.1.3.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. Prior to version 1.6.5, Authlib’s JWE zip=DEF path performs unbounded DEFLATE decompression. A very small ciphertext can expand into tens or hundreds of megabytes on decrypt, allowing an attacker who can supply decryptable tokens to exhaust memory and CPU and cause denial of service. This issue has been patched in version 1.6.5. Workarounds for this issue involve rejecting or stripping zip=DEF for inbound JWEs at the application boundary, forking and add a bounded decompression guard via decompressobj().decompress(data, MAX_SIZE)) and returning an error when output exceeds a safe limit, or enforcing strict maximum token sizes and fail fast on oversized inputs; combine with rate limiting.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

OpenBao is an open source identity-based secrets management system. Prior to version 2.4.2, OpenBao's audit log did not appropriately redact fields when relevant subsystems sent []byte response parameters rather than strings. This includes, but is not limited to sys/raw with use of encoding=base64, all data would be emitted unredacted to the audit log, and Transit, when performing a signing operation with a derived Ed25519 key, would emit public keys to the audit log. This issue has been patched in OpenBao 2.4.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:P/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X