Comparison Overview

CanvasPeople

VS

Accent Ink

CanvasPeople

22700 Savi Ranch Pkwy, Yorba Linda, California, 92887, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.canvaspeople.com

CanvasPeople was started in 2009 with the goal of preserving memories as art. We are lovers of photography and home décor and figured it would be a great idea to combine them. Fast forward several years and we have become a quality source for photo canvases and other personalized products. We are always looking for ways to improve our business and take pride in delivering great products to our customers.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Accent Ink

None
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
http://www.accentinkla.com

Accent Ink, Incorporated is a privately owned corporation. In 2006 they purchased the building and other assets of Coast Ink and Coating (formerly Merit Ink Headquarters, established in 1960). The facility was upgraded with new equipment and improvements in manufacturing processes and quality control. Accent Ink manufactures inks and coating for commercial printing companies. It is the only manufacturing facility in the Western United States with the understanding, experience, and equipment capability for manufacturing inks and coatings for the flexographic, gravure, letterpress, lithographic and screen printing processes. While it is a full service ink company, Accent Ink caters mostly to markets requiring specialty inks and coating. A major area of product focus has always been in inks and coatings for the food packaging industry. All products are manufactured in compliance to Federal, State and local standards. We use quality raw materials to enable us to manufacture products which deliver the quality and performance required by our customers.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/canvaspeople.jpeg
CanvasPeople
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/accent-ink.jpeg
Accent Ink
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CanvasPeople
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Accent Ink
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CanvasPeople in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Accent Ink in 2025.

Incident History — CanvasPeople (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CanvasPeople cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Accent Ink (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Accent Ink cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/canvaspeople.jpeg
CanvasPeople
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/accent-ink.jpeg
Accent Ink
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Accent Ink company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CanvasPeople company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Accent Ink company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CanvasPeople company.

In the current year, Accent Ink company and CanvasPeople company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Accent Ink company nor CanvasPeople company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Accent Ink company nor CanvasPeople company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Accent Ink company nor CanvasPeople company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CanvasPeople company nor Accent Ink company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CanvasPeople nor Accent Ink holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CanvasPeople company nor Accent Ink company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CanvasPeople company employs more people globally than Accent Ink company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither CanvasPeople nor Accent Ink holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CanvasPeople nor Accent Ink holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CanvasPeople nor Accent Ink holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CanvasPeople nor Accent Ink holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CanvasPeople nor Accent Ink holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CanvasPeople nor Accent Ink holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References