Comparison Overview

Cannabis Information Sharing & Analysis Organization (Cannabis ISAO)

VS

GLG

Cannabis Information Sharing & Analysis Organization (Cannabis ISAO)

Leesburg, 20176, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 700 and 749

The Cannabis Information Sharing & Analysis Center

NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition: Other Information Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

GLG

60 East 42nd Street, 3rd Floor, New York, NY, US, 10165
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 700 and 749

GLG is the world’s largest insight network. We connect decision makers to the right experts so they can act with the confidence that comes from true clarity and have what it takes to get ahead. Our network of experts is the world’s largest source of first-hand expertise, and we recruit hundreds of new experts every day. We bring the power of insight to every great professional decision. Visit GLGinsights.com. For information regarding GLG’s practices with respect to personal information, please visit our privacy policy at https://glginsights.com/privacy-policy/

NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition: Other Information Services
Employees: 11,918
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/glg.jpeg
GLG
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cannabis Information Sharing & Analysis Organization (Cannabis ISAO)
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
GLG
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Information Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cannabis Information Sharing & Analysis Organization (Cannabis ISAO) in 2025.

Incidents vs Information Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GLG in 2025.

Incident History — Cannabis Information Sharing & Analysis Organization (Cannabis ISAO) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cannabis Information Sharing & Analysis Organization (Cannabis ISAO) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — GLG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GLG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cannabis-isao.jpeg
Cannabis Information Sharing & Analysis Organization (Cannabis ISAO)
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Defacement of Tor leak site
Motivation: Potential backlash from the cyber community or an inside exit scam
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/glg.jpeg
GLG
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2023
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Cannabis Information Sharing & Analysis Organization (Cannabis ISAO) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to GLG company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Cannabis Information Sharing & Analysis Organization (Cannabis ISAO) and GLG have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, GLG company and Cannabis Information Sharing & Analysis Organization (Cannabis ISAO) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

GLG company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Cannabis Information Sharing & Analysis Organization (Cannabis ISAO) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Cannabis Information Sharing & Analysis Organization (Cannabis ISAO) company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other GLG company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither GLG company nor Cannabis Information Sharing & Analysis Organization (Cannabis ISAO) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cannabis Information Sharing & Analysis Organization (Cannabis ISAO) company nor GLG company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cannabis Information Sharing & Analysis Organization (Cannabis ISAO) nor GLG holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

GLG company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Cannabis Information Sharing & Analysis Organization (Cannabis ISAO) company.

GLG company employs more people globally than Cannabis Information Sharing & Analysis Organization (Cannabis ISAO) company, reflecting its scale as a Information Services.

Neither Cannabis Information Sharing & Analysis Organization (Cannabis ISAO) nor GLG holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cannabis Information Sharing & Analysis Organization (Cannabis ISAO) nor GLG holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cannabis Information Sharing & Analysis Organization (Cannabis ISAO) nor GLG holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cannabis Information Sharing & Analysis Organization (Cannabis ISAO) nor GLG holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cannabis Information Sharing & Analysis Organization (Cannabis ISAO) nor GLG holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cannabis Information Sharing & Analysis Organization (Cannabis ISAO) nor GLG holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N