Comparison Overview

Candy V Designs

VS

Studio MESH

Candy V Designs

undefined, Las Vegas, NV, 89148, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

Candy V Designs is a boutique-style Graphic Design Agency created to build your brand, bring your vision to life while you get to share your passion. We specialize in anything design- from a simple business card, flyers, banners, custom logos, marketing, advertising, all the way to web design. Anything your company needs to succeed, we are here to help you!

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Studio MESH

609 Tennessee Ave, Charleston, West Virginia, 25302, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 700 and 749

MESH is your full service communication design and tech studio. We make brands, websites, print works, digital media, objects, and other fun stuff to share your good ideas. Our work promotes greater equity, playful education, healthy living, creative entrepreneurship, creative technology, local economies, and good old-fashioned fun. We work with creative and social entrepreneurs and nonprofit organizations to build brands, digital experiences and communication tools that improve the way we all live. meshfresh.com

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/candyvdesigns.jpeg
Candy V Designs
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mesh-design-and-development.jpeg
Studio MESH
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Candy V Designs
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Studio MESH
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Candy V Designs in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Studio MESH in 2025.

Incident History — Candy V Designs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Candy V Designs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Studio MESH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Studio MESH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/candyvdesigns.jpeg
Candy V Designs
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mesh-design-and-development.jpeg
Studio MESH
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Candy V Designs company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Studio MESH company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Studio MESH company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Candy V Designs company.

In the current year, Studio MESH company and Candy V Designs company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Studio MESH company nor Candy V Designs company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Studio MESH company nor Candy V Designs company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Studio MESH company nor Candy V Designs company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Candy V Designs company nor Studio MESH company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Candy V Designs nor Studio MESH holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Candy V Designs company nor Studio MESH company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Studio MESH company employs more people globally than Candy V Designs company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Candy V Designs nor Studio MESH holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Candy V Designs nor Studio MESH holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Candy V Designs nor Studio MESH holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Candy V Designs nor Studio MESH holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Candy V Designs nor Studio MESH holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Candy V Designs nor Studio MESH holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X