Comparison Overview

Canadian Institute for Cybersecurity

VS

CEA

Canadian Institute for Cybersecurity

46 Dineen Dr, Fredericton, E3B, CA
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://www.unb.ca/cic

Welcome to the official LinkedIn page of the Canadian Institute for Cybersecurity (CIC)! 🌐 At CIC, we are dedicated to advancing cybersecurity through cutting-edge research, education, and collaboration. Our mission is to protect individuals, businesses, and critical infrastructure from cyber threats by developing innovative solutions and fostering a culture of cybersecurity awareness. 🔍 What We Do: -Conduct groundbreaking research in cybersecurity and privacy. -Offer educational programs and training for students and professionals. -Collaborate with industry partners to address real-world cybersecurity challenges. -Host webinars, workshops, and events to share knowledge and best practices. Join our community to stay updated on the latest cybersecurity trends, news, and events. Together, we can build a safer digital world! #CyberSecurity #Research #Education #Innovation #CanadianInstituteForCybersecurity

NAICS: 5417
NAICS Definition: Scientific Research and Development Services
Employees: 61
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
View Profile

CEA

Bâtiment Le Ponant D, Paris, 75015, FR
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cea.fr

The CEA is the French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission ("Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives"​). It is a public body established in October 1945 by General de Gaulle. A leader in research, development and innovation, the CEA mission statement has two main objectives: To become the leading technological research organization in Europe and to ensure that the nuclear deterrent remains effective in the future. The CEA is active in four main areas: low-carbon energies, defense and security, information technologies and health technologies. In each of these fields, the CEA maintains a cross-disciplinary culture of engineers and researchers, building on the synergies between fundamental and technological research. The civilian programs of the CEA received 49% of their funding from the French government, and 30% from external sources (partner companies and the European Union). The CEA had a budget of 4,3 billion euros. The CEA is based in ten research centers in France, each specializing in specific fields. The laboratories are located in the Paris region, the Rhône-Alpes, the Rhône valley, the Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur region, Aquitaine, Central France and Burgundy. The CEA benefits from the strong regional identities of these laboratories and the partnerships forged with other research centers, local authorities and universities.

NAICS: 5417
NAICS Definition: Scientific Research and Development Services
Employees: 18,601
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/canadian_institute_cybersecurity.jpeg
Canadian Institute for Cybersecurity
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cea.jpeg
CEA
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Canadian Institute for Cybersecurity
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CEA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Research Services Industry Average (This Year)

Canadian Institute for Cybersecurity has 83.33% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Research Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CEA in 2026.

Incident History — Canadian Institute for Cybersecurity (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Canadian Institute for Cybersecurity cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CEA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CEA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/canadian_institute_cybersecurity.jpeg
Canadian Institute for Cybersecurity
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Infostealing Malware
Motivation: Financial Gain, Account Takeovers, Ransomware Attacks
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2023
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Malicious browser extensions, Phishing, Brute-force attack, Third-party vendor compromise
Motivation: Financial gain, Data exfiltration, Ad fraud, Extortion
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cea.jpeg
CEA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CEA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Canadian Institute for Cybersecurity company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Canadian Institute for Cybersecurity company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas CEA company has not reported any.

In the current year, Canadian Institute for Cybersecurity company has reported more cyber incidents than CEA company.

Neither CEA company nor Canadian Institute for Cybersecurity company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Canadian Institute for Cybersecurity company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other CEA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither CEA company nor Canadian Institute for Cybersecurity company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Canadian Institute for Cybersecurity company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while CEA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Canadian Institute for Cybersecurity nor CEA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

CEA company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Canadian Institute for Cybersecurity company.

CEA company employs more people globally than Canadian Institute for Cybersecurity company, reflecting its scale as a Research Services.

Neither Canadian Institute for Cybersecurity nor CEA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Canadian Institute for Cybersecurity nor CEA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Canadian Institute for Cybersecurity nor CEA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Canadian Institute for Cybersecurity nor CEA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Canadian Institute for Cybersecurity nor CEA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Canadian Institute for Cybersecurity nor CEA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References