Comparison Overview

Canadian War Museum

VS

Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo

Canadian War Museum

1 Vimy Place, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0M8, CA
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.warmuseum.ca

The Canadian War Museum is Canada’s national museum of military history and one of the world’s most respected museums for the study and understanding of armed conflict. The Museum’s collections are among the finest military holdings in the world, including rare vehicles, artillery, uniforms, medals, personal memoirs and more than 13,000 works in the Beaverbrook Collection of War Art. In total, the collection comprises more than 3 million artifacts, specimens, works of art, written documents and sound and visual recordings. The Military History Research Centre houses the George Metcalf Archival Collection and the Hartland Molson Library. These extensive collections of primary and secondary research material document Canada’s rich military history.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 88
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo

1875 Noble Ave, Bridgeport, 06610, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
https://beardsleyzoo.org

Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo is the state's only zoo - providing wild experiences for more than 100 years. Visit more than 350 species of primarily North and South American animals, including Amur tiger and leopards, Brazilian ocelot, Mexican wolves, and golden Lion tamarins. Highlights include our new Andean bear habitat, spider monkey habitat, Natt Family Red Panda Habitat, South American rainforest with free-flight aviary, the prairie dog exhibit with "pop-up"​ viewing areas, the New England Farmyard with goats, cows, pigs, and other barnyard favorites, plus the hoofstock trail featuring bison, deer, and more.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 59
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/canadian-war-museum.jpeg
Canadian War Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/connecticut's-beardsley-zoo.jpeg
Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Canadian War Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Canadian War Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo in 2026.

Incident History — Canadian War Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Canadian War Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/canadian-war-museum.jpeg
Canadian War Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/connecticut's-beardsley-zoo.jpeg
Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Canadian War Museum company and Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Canadian War Museum company.

In the current year, Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company and Canadian War Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company nor Canadian War Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company nor Canadian War Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company nor Canadian War Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Canadian War Museum company nor Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Canadian War Museum nor Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Canadian War Museum company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company.

Canadian War Museum company employs more people globally than Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Canadian War Museum nor Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Canadian War Museum nor Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Canadian War Museum nor Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Canadian War Museum nor Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Canadian War Museum nor Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Canadian War Museum nor Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References