Comparison Overview

Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA)

VS

Servicepunt71

Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA)

55 York St., Toronto, Ontario, M5J1R7, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

For more than 100 years, we’ve been the voice for public transit—so it can keep our communities moving safely and sustainably. Every day, millions of Canadians depend on public transit to get where they need to go. And while that may seem simple enough, public transit relies on technology, innovation, and investment to keep our communities moving safely and efficiently. It also relies on us. To communicate with governments—and within the sector. Depuis plus de 100 ans, nous jouons le rôle de porte-parole du transport collectif, afin que les membres de nos collectivités puissent continuer de se déplacer de façon sécuritaire et durable. Chaque jour, des millions de Canadiens dépendent du transport collectif pour se rendre où ils doivent aller. Bien que cela puisse sembler assez simple, le transport collectif est tributaire de la technologie, de l’innovation et de l’investissement pour assurer le transport sécuritaire et efficace des membres de nos collectivités. Il dépend également de nous. Pour communiquer avec les gouvernements et au sein du secteur.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Servicepunt71

Tweelingstraat 4, 2312LX, Leiden, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Servicepunt71, shared service organisatie voor de interne bedrijfsvoering in de publieke sector Servicepunt71 zorgt sinds 1 januari 2012 voor de interne bedrijfsvoering van de gemeenten Leiden, Leiderdorp, Oegstgeest en Zoeterwoude en de eigen organisatie. De gemeenten zijn tevens eigenaar. Servicepunt71 levert producten en diensten op het gebied van ICT, HRM, Financiën, Juridische Zaken en Inkoop en voor de gemeenten Leiden en Leiderdorp ook Facilitaire Zaken.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 71
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/canadian-urban-transit-association.jpeg
Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/servicepunt71.jpeg
Servicepunt71
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Servicepunt71
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Servicepunt71 in 2025.

Incident History — Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Servicepunt71 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Servicepunt71 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/canadian-urban-transit-association.jpeg
Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/servicepunt71.jpeg
Servicepunt71
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Servicepunt71 company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Servicepunt71 company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) company.

In the current year, Servicepunt71 company and Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Servicepunt71 company nor Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Servicepunt71 company nor Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Servicepunt71 company nor Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) company nor Servicepunt71 company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) nor Servicepunt71 holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) company nor Servicepunt71 company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Servicepunt71 company employs more people globally than Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) nor Servicepunt71 holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) nor Servicepunt71 holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) nor Servicepunt71 holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) nor Servicepunt71 holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) nor Servicepunt71 holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) nor Servicepunt71 holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H