Comparison Overview

Canadian International Council

VS

Public Agenda

Canadian International Council

6 Hoskin Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1H8, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://thecic.org/

The Canadian International Council (CIC) is a non-partisan, nationwide organization established to strengthen Canada's foreign policy. It promotes dialogue on international affairs issues through a network that crosses academic disciplines, policy areas and economic sectors. The CIC’s council activities offer Canadian corporate, academic, media, and policy communities the opportunity to participate in an important forum on international issues, operating on the premise that the application of expert and evidence-based research on complex international issues provides the cornerstone for effective policy making. The CIC is a unique, nation-wide organization that incorporates the voices and feedback of citizens across the country through its branch network, currently numbering 18 from coast to coast, that engage local communities with programs that involve speakers, seminars, roundtable discussions and conferences as well as study groups that generate citizen dialogue and involvement in international affairs.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 49
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Public Agenda

195 Montague Street, Brooklyn, NY, 11201, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749
http://publicagenda.org

Public Agenda believes that a strong democracy requires informed citizens, engaged communities, productive public conversations, and policies that reflect the public’s concerns and values. Through nonpartisan research and public engagement, we work to make these essentials a reality while fostering progress on the issues people care about most, particularly those essential to expanding opportunity for all Americans.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/canadian-international-council.jpeg
Canadian International Council
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/public-agenda.jpeg
Public Agenda
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Canadian International Council
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Public Agenda
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Canadian International Council in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Public Agenda in 2025.

Incident History — Canadian International Council (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Canadian International Council cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Public Agenda (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Public Agenda cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/canadian-international-council.jpeg
Canadian International Council
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/public-agenda.jpeg
Public Agenda
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Canadian International Council company and Public Agenda company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Public Agenda company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Canadian International Council company.

In the current year, Public Agenda company and Canadian International Council company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Public Agenda company nor Canadian International Council company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Public Agenda company nor Canadian International Council company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Public Agenda company nor Canadian International Council company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Canadian International Council company nor Public Agenda company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Canadian International Council nor Public Agenda holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Canadian International Council company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Public Agenda company.

Canadian International Council company employs more people globally than Public Agenda company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Canadian International Council nor Public Agenda holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Canadian International Council nor Public Agenda holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Canadian International Council nor Public Agenda holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Canadian International Council nor Public Agenda holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Canadian International Council nor Public Agenda holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Canadian International Council nor Public Agenda holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References