Comparison Overview

Canadian Art

VS

Reviews in Urology

Canadian Art

215 Spadina Ave, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2C7, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Canadian Art is the preeminent platform for journalism and criticism about art and culture in Canada. Our award-winning print, digital, educational and programming initiatives deliver smart, accessible ideas, stories and opinions. A national non-profit foundation, Canadian Art develops and supports art writers, and engages with the work of artists, established and new. Most important, we develop inclusive platforms to understand, debate and be inspired by art. In addition to publishing in print and online, the Canadian Art Foundation also presents innovative events and educational programs including School Hop and the Canadian Art Encounters speaker series. These programs support our mandate to engage audiences nationwide and address urgent and evolving issues through the lens of contemporary art and culture.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Reviews in Urology

Cleveland, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Specialty Networks’ flagship publication and the official journal of LUGPA, is designed to review the latest advances in the diagnosis and treatment of a wide range of urological conditions to help the busy, practicing urologist keep up to date with the rapidly evolving field of urology. Reviews in Urology circulation is approximately all 10,000+ practicing urologists, including residents and fellows, in the United States.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/canadian-art-foundation.jpeg
Canadian Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reviews-in-urology.jpeg
Reviews in Urology
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Canadian Art
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Reviews in Urology
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Canadian Art in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Reviews in Urology in 2025.

Incident History — Canadian Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Canadian Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Reviews in Urology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Reviews in Urology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/canadian-art-foundation.jpeg
Canadian Art
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reviews-in-urology.jpeg
Reviews in Urology
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Reviews in Urology company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Canadian Art company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Reviews in Urology company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Canadian Art company.

In the current year, Reviews in Urology company and Canadian Art company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Reviews in Urology company nor Canadian Art company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Reviews in Urology company nor Canadian Art company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Reviews in Urology company nor Canadian Art company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Canadian Art company nor Reviews in Urology company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Canadian Art nor Reviews in Urology holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Reviews in Urology company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Canadian Art company.

Neither Canadian Art nor Reviews in Urology holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Canadian Art nor Reviews in Urology holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Canadian Art nor Reviews in Urology holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Canadian Art nor Reviews in Urology holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Canadian Art nor Reviews in Urology holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Canadian Art nor Reviews in Urology holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.