Comparison Overview

The Arnott's Group

VS

PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk

The Arnott's Group

24 George st, North Strathfield, NSW, 2137, AU
Last Update: 2025-03-05 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900
https://www.arnotts.com/

Strong

The Arnott’s Group is proud of its delicious and iconic portfolio of brands that continue the legacy begun by the Arnott family in 1865. Created locally, we provide quality, great-tasting food to delight consumers around the world. The Arnott’s Group is headquartered in Sydney and employs approximately 4,000 people in markets across the Asia Pacific region. This includes manufacturing sites in NSW, QLD, VIC and SA as well as New Zealand, Malaysia and Indonesia. The Arnott’s Group portfolio includes the iconic Arnott’s brands along with Campbell’s products in Australia, Malaysia, Hong Kong and Japan, a cereal and snacks division called Good Food Partners and the 180 degrees luxury biscuit brand.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 1,492
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk

Jakarta, Jakarta 12910, ID
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900
http://www.indofood.co.id

Over a number of decades PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk has been progressively transformed to become a Total Food Solutions company with operations in all stages of food manufacturing from the production of raw materials and their processing through to consumer products in the market. Today, it is renowned as a well–established company & a leading player in each category of business in which it operates. In its business operations, Indofood capitalizes on its resilient business model with 4 complementary Strategic Business Groups : Consumer Branded Products (CBP). Indofood CBP is one of the leading packaged food producers in Indonesia, with a wide range of packaged food products. ICBP product brands are among the strongest brands with the most significant mind share in Indonesia for consumer food brands. Bogasari, primarily a producer of wheat flour as well as pasta. Its business operations are supported by shipping and packaging units. Agribusiness. The Group’s principal business activities range from research and development, seed breeding, oil palm cultivation and milling; as well as the production & marketing of branded cooking oils, margarine and shortening. In addition, the Group is also involved in the cultivation and processing of rubber and sugar cane as well as other crops. Distribution, which boasts the most extensive distribution network in Indonesia, distributes the majority of Indofood’s and its subsidiaries’ consumer products as well as third–party products. Cultivation and Processed Vegetables activities are conducted by China Minzhong Food Corporation Limited (“CMFC”) which is listed on the SGX and is an integrated vegetable processing company in the People’s Republic of China. Through its decades of experience CMFC has developed an integrated demand-driven operation with wide-ranging cultivation and processing capabilities. In addition, CMFC also has a branded products operation.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/campbellarnotts.jpeg
The Arnott's Group
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pt-indofood-sukses-makmur-tbk.jpeg
PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
The Arnott's Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Arnott's Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk in 2025.

Incident History — The Arnott's Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Arnott's Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/campbellarnotts.jpeg
The Arnott's Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pt-indofood-sukses-makmur-tbk.jpeg
PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both The Arnott's Group company and PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Arnott's Group company.

In the current year, PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk company and The Arnott's Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk company nor The Arnott's Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk company nor The Arnott's Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk company nor The Arnott's Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Arnott's Group company nor PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

The Arnott's Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk company.

The Arnott's Group company employs more people globally than PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk company, reflecting its scale as a Manufacturing.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Protection Against Voltage and Clock Glitches in FPGA devices, could allow an attacker with physical access to undervolt the platform resulting in a loss of confidentiality.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Malicious code was inserted into the Nx (build system) package and several related plugins. The tampered package was published to the npm software registry, via a supply-chain attack. Affected versions contain code that scans the file system, collects credentials, and posts them to GitHub as a repo under user's accounts.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In versions from 2.1.0 to before 2.3.0, the API endpoint GET /api/problems/:id returns challenge hints in plaintext within the question object, regardless of whether the user has unlocked them via point deduction. Users can view all hints for free, undermining the business logic of the platform and reducing the integrity of the challenge system. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.0.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In version 2.1.0, the /api/admin/assign-badge endpoint lacks proper access control, allowing any authenticated user to assign high-privilege badges (e.g., Staff) to themselves. This could lead to privilege escalation and impersonation of administrative roles. This issue has been patched in version 2.2.0.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
References
Description

parse is a package designed to parse JavaScript SDK. A Prototype Pollution vulnerability in the SingleInstanceStateController.initializeState function of parse version 5.3.0 and before allows attackers to inject properties on Object.prototype via supplying a crafted payload, causing denial of service (DoS) as the minimum consequence.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
References