Comparison Overview

The Campbell's Company

VS

Cargill

The Campbell's Company

One Campbell Place, Camden, NJ, 08103, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09

Since 1869, we’ve been connecting people through food they love. Our history was created by remarkable people, ideas and innovations. We are stewards of amazing brands. We have a focused strategy and leading brands in our two divisions: Meals & Beverages and Snacks. We foster a culture of belonging where people come first. We live our values, always, and show great care for the communities we call home. We are passionate and relentless in our pursuit of winning with character, while setting the highest standards for performance.

NAICS: 311
NAICS Definition: Food Manufacturing
Employees: 11,272
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cargill

15407 McGinty Rd W, Wayzata, Minnesota, 55391, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

Cargill is a family company committed to nourishing the world in a safe, responsible and sustainable way. With over 158 years of experience, we sit at the heart of the supply chain, partnering with producers and customers to source, make and deliver products that are vital for living. Whether it’s making alternative proteins for food manufacturers or helping farmers raise healthier animals with AI, we put as much care into how things are sourced as what we provide. We put people first. We do the right thing—today and for generations to come.

NAICS: 311
NAICS Definition: Food Manufacturing
Employees: 69,828
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/campbell-soup-company.jpeg
The Campbell's Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cargill.jpeg
Cargill
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Campbell's Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cargill
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Campbell's Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cargill in 2025.

Incident History — The Campbell's Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Campbell's Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cargill (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cargill cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/campbell-soup-company.jpeg
The Campbell's Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cargill.jpeg
Cargill
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cargill company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Campbell's Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cargill company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Campbell's Company company.

In the current year, Cargill company and The Campbell's Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cargill company nor The Campbell's Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cargill company nor The Campbell's Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cargill company nor The Campbell's Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Campbell's Company company nor Cargill company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Campbell's Company nor Cargill holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Cargill company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to The Campbell's Company company.

Cargill company employs more people globally than The Campbell's Company company, reflecting its scale as a Food and Beverage Manufacturing.

Neither The Campbell's Company nor Cargill holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Campbell's Company nor Cargill holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Campbell's Company nor Cargill holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Campbell's Company nor Cargill holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Campbell's Company nor Cargill holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Campbell's Company nor Cargill holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N