Comparison Overview

Campbell Printing Company

VS

Optichrome

Campbell Printing Company

2059 Cleveland Hwy, Dalton, Georgia, 30721, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.campbellprintingco.com

Premium provider of product marketing tools. Our vision is to be the most successful and respected sample book company in the United States. A family business located in Dalton, GA, we are expert at sample books and binders that gets your product noticed and to the market quickly. We develop innovative vehicles to display product, and do so with sustainability at the forefront of the design.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Optichrome

Maybury Road, Woking, England, GU21 5HX, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.optichrome.com

With a proud heritage spanning over 50 years, Optichrome is a premium Print, Marketing and Communications specialist based in the South East of England. At our modern site we utilise state-of-the-art Digital and Lithographic printing equipment as well as offering cutting-edge digital hybrid marketing solutions. Our areas of speciality include: - Variable Data Programming - Litho printing - Digital Printing - Design - Data Management - Multi-Channel Communications - Marketing Campaigns - Augmented Reality - Mailing and Fulfilment - MailHub - For more information on this unique service visit: http://mailhubuk.co.uk/ Optichrome is proud of its environmentally friendly credentials. It is one of only 10 printers in the UK to have successfully achieved both ISO14001 and EMAS accreditations in the last 3 years. For more information visit: http://www.optichrome.com/environmental As specialists in marketing campaigns, effective business communications and commercial print - follow Optichrome for marketing tips, blog posts and news surrounding the print industry.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/campbell-printing-company.jpeg
Campbell Printing Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/optichrome.jpeg
Optichrome
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Campbell Printing Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Optichrome
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Campbell Printing Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Optichrome in 2025.

Incident History — Campbell Printing Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Campbell Printing Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Optichrome (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Optichrome cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/campbell-printing-company.jpeg
Campbell Printing Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/optichrome.jpeg
Optichrome
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Campbell Printing Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Optichrome company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Optichrome company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Campbell Printing Company company.

In the current year, Optichrome company and Campbell Printing Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Optichrome company nor Campbell Printing Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Optichrome company nor Campbell Printing Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Optichrome company nor Campbell Printing Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Campbell Printing Company company nor Optichrome company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Campbell Printing Company nor Optichrome holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Campbell Printing Company company nor Optichrome company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Campbell Printing Company company employs more people globally than Optichrome company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Campbell Printing Company nor Optichrome holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Campbell Printing Company nor Optichrome holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Campbell Printing Company nor Optichrome holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Campbell Printing Company nor Optichrome holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Campbell Printing Company nor Optichrome holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Campbell Printing Company nor Optichrome holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References