Comparison Overview

Campbell Printing Company

VS

Frankston Packaging Company

Campbell Printing Company

2059 Cleveland Hwy, Dalton, Georgia, 30721, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.campbellprintingco.com

Premium provider of product marketing tools. Our vision is to be the most successful and respected sample book company in the United States. A family business located in Dalton, GA, we are expert at sample books and binders that gets your product noticed and to the market quickly. We develop innovative vehicles to display product, and do so with sustainability at the forefront of the design.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Frankston Packaging Company

699 N. Frankston Hwy, Frankston, Texas, 75763, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799
http://www.frankstonpackaging.com/index.html

You have just arrived at the Best-in-Class designer, manufacturer, and distributor of: High Quality Paperboard Folding Cartons Printed and Unprinted Custom Boxes Unprinted Stock Boxes Plastic Folding Cartons Printed and Unprinted Litho Laminated Corrugated Displays Rigid / Setup Boxes Printed and Unprinted Custom Boxes Stock Boxes / Calling Card Boxes Vinyl Boxes Plain and Hotstamped Can be matched up with a Rigid / Setup Base Overhead Transparency Converting and Fulfillment

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 75
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/campbell-printing-company.jpeg
Campbell Printing Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/frankston-packaging-company.jpeg
Frankston Packaging Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Campbell Printing Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Frankston Packaging Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Campbell Printing Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Frankston Packaging Company in 2025.

Incident History — Campbell Printing Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Campbell Printing Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Frankston Packaging Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Frankston Packaging Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/campbell-printing-company.jpeg
Campbell Printing Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/frankston-packaging-company.jpeg
Frankston Packaging Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Campbell Printing Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Frankston Packaging Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Frankston Packaging Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Campbell Printing Company company.

In the current year, Frankston Packaging Company company and Campbell Printing Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Frankston Packaging Company company nor Campbell Printing Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Frankston Packaging Company company nor Campbell Printing Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Frankston Packaging Company company nor Campbell Printing Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Campbell Printing Company company nor Frankston Packaging Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Campbell Printing Company nor Frankston Packaging Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Campbell Printing Company company nor Frankston Packaging Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Frankston Packaging Company company employs more people globally than Campbell Printing Company company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Campbell Printing Company nor Frankston Packaging Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Campbell Printing Company nor Frankston Packaging Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Campbell Printing Company nor Frankston Packaging Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Campbell Printing Company nor Frankston Packaging Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Campbell Printing Company nor Frankston Packaging Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Campbell Printing Company nor Frankston Packaging Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References