Comparison Overview

Camp Pixel

VS

jackophant

Camp Pixel

607 NW 28th St, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 700 and 749

Camp Pixel is a versatile and imaginative creative services studio that crafts effective digital branding and graphical solutions for an assortment of industries. Creating lively animation, sensible branding, and stunning visualizations are the cornerstones of our company, but we welcome all ideas into our camp, letting project needs become our map while our expertise and talent serve as our guide. We like to have fun, but we’re serious about staying on top of the evolving digital landscape and the latest technological advancements. We’re the experts so you don’t have to be, but we’re always open to discovering new possibilities together with our clients. We can even set up camp and work remotely with you on location. We’re here to creatively clarify your message. Please feel free to check out the vast array of creative services we offer, and if you like what you see, send us a message and let us know what we can create for you.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

jackophant

None
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

The company started as a platform for myself to investigate various technologies. Through jackophant I have been able to experiment with branding, social media, print media (including miscellaneous homeware, stickers, and apparel), live streaming, web hosting, PC building and a wide range of graphic design, but principally I have been able to experience running a company.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/camp-pixel.jpeg
Camp Pixel
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jackophant.jpeg
jackophant
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Camp Pixel
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
jackophant
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Camp Pixel in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for jackophant in 2025.

Incident History — Camp Pixel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Camp Pixel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — jackophant (X = Date, Y = Severity)

jackophant cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/camp-pixel.jpeg
Camp Pixel
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jackophant.jpeg
jackophant
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

jackophant company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Camp Pixel company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, jackophant company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Camp Pixel company.

In the current year, jackophant company and Camp Pixel company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither jackophant company nor Camp Pixel company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither jackophant company nor Camp Pixel company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither jackophant company nor Camp Pixel company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Camp Pixel company nor jackophant company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Camp Pixel nor jackophant holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Camp Pixel company nor jackophant company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Camp Pixel nor jackophant holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Camp Pixel nor jackophant holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Camp Pixel nor jackophant holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Camp Pixel nor jackophant holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Camp Pixel nor jackophant holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Camp Pixel nor jackophant holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X