Comparison Overview

Cameron, a Schlumberger company

VS

Halliburton

Cameron, a Schlumberger company

1333 West Loop South, Houston, TX, 77027, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.slb.com/companies/cameron

Cameron is a SLB company. For updates and information, please follow the main SLB company page on LinkedIn at: https://www.linkedin.com/company/slbglobal/ Cameron, a SLB company, is a leading provider of flow equipment products, systems and services to worldwide oil, gas and process industries. Leveraging its global manufacturing, sales and service network, the operating segments of Cameron work with oil and gas industry experts spanning many markets and applications to create the flow control technologies that energize the world.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 18,442
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Halliburton

3000 N. Sam Houston Pkwy E., Houston, Texas, US, 77032
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
https://www.halliburton.com

We collaborate and engineer solutions to maximize asset value for our customers. Founded in 1919, Halliburton is one of the world's largest providers of products and services to the energy industry. With more than 45,000 employees, representing 130 nationalities in more than 80 countries, the company helps its customers maximize value throughout the lifecycle of the reservoir – from locating hydrocarbons and managing geological data, to drilling and formation evaluation, well construction and completion, and optimizing production throughout the life of the asset.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 58,792
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cameron.jpeg
Cameron, a Schlumberger company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/halliburton.jpeg
Halliburton
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cameron, a Schlumberger company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Halliburton
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cameron, a Schlumberger company in 2025.

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Halliburton in 2025.

Incident History — Cameron, a Schlumberger company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cameron, a Schlumberger company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Halliburton (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Halliburton cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cameron.jpeg
Cameron, a Schlumberger company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/halliburton.jpeg
Halliburton
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Halliburton company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cameron, a Schlumberger company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Halliburton company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Cameron, a Schlumberger company company has not reported any.

In the current year, Halliburton company and Cameron, a Schlumberger company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Halliburton company nor Cameron, a Schlumberger company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Halliburton company nor Cameron, a Schlumberger company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Halliburton company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Cameron, a Schlumberger company company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Cameron, a Schlumberger company company nor Halliburton company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cameron, a Schlumberger company nor Halliburton holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Cameron, a Schlumberger company company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Halliburton company.

Halliburton company employs more people globally than Cameron, a Schlumberger company company, reflecting its scale as a Oil and Gas.

Neither Cameron, a Schlumberger company nor Halliburton holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cameron, a Schlumberger company nor Halliburton holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cameron, a Schlumberger company nor Halliburton holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cameron, a Schlumberger company nor Halliburton holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cameron, a Schlumberger company nor Halliburton holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cameron, a Schlumberger company nor Halliburton holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A weakness has been identified in itsourcecode Online Pet Shop Management System 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /pet1/addcnp.php. This manipulation of the argument cnpname causes sql injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Published
Date
2025-12-13
Updated
Date
2025-12-13
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tenda AX9 22.03.01.46. This affects the function image_check of the component httpd. The manipulation results in use of weak hash. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. It is indicated that the exploitability is difficult. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.

Published
Date
2025-12-13
Updated
Date
2025-12-13
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.6
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A weakness has been identified in code-projects Student File Management System 1.0. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /admin/update_student.php. This manipulation of the argument stud_id causes sql injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Published
Date
2025-12-13
Updated
Date
2025-12-13
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in code-projects Student File Management System 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /admin/save_user.php. The manipulation of the argument firstname results in sql injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.

Published
Date
2025-12-13
Updated
Date
2025-12-13
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was identified in code-projects Student File Management System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /admin/update_user.php. The manipulation of the argument user_id leads to sql injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.

Published
Date
2025-12-13
Updated
Date
2025-12-13
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References