Comparison Overview

Cambridge LLP

VS

Thomas Guise

Cambridge LLP

333 Adelaide Street West , Toronto, Ontario, M5V 1R5, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Cambridge LLP is a fast-growing boutique with a focus on all forms of business litigation, cross-border litigation, defamation, real estate and construction litigation, and estates, trusts & wealth planning. We are positioned to serve the world from Canada, with offices in Toronto, Burlington, Barrie, and Elliot Lake. The experts in our Chinese Services Group offers all our litigation services in both Mandarin and Cantonese. We understand the diverse legal challenges facing entrepreneurs, businesses and governments in today’s increasingly complicated legal environment. Our commitment and mission is to find ingenious solutions and relentlessly pursue our clients’ interests.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 63
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Thomas Guise

Haydon House, Studley, B80 7AN, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 800 and 849

Thomas Guise Solicitors is a leading regional law firm, with offices in Studley, Worcester and Birmingham. We are a firm of highly experienced solicitors who have built long lasting relationships with clients, which is a key factor to our long and trust worthy reputation. Our clients range from individuals to large corporations. We have built an enviable reputation for providing legal services to specialist sectors such as Chinese Business, Care Homes and Retail. We provide the full spectrum of legal services for commercial and private clients: • Corporate and Commercial • Commercial and Residential Property • Dispute Resolution • Employment • Wills and Probate Testament to the high quality service provided to clients, Thomas Guise have achieved recognition within the Legal 500 2019 edition as a leading West Midlands law firm in the areas of Employment and Private Client area. Thomas Guise works to the ISO 9001 accreditation for Quality Management standard. This quality mark demonstrates our commitment to meeting client’s needs , operating efficient management processes and delivering consistent, good quality services.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cambridge-llp.jpeg
Cambridge LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thomas-guise.jpeg
Thomas Guise
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cambridge LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Thomas Guise
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cambridge LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Thomas Guise in 2025.

Incident History — Cambridge LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cambridge LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Thomas Guise (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Thomas Guise cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cambridge-llp.jpeg
Cambridge LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thomas-guise.jpeg
Thomas Guise
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Thomas Guise company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cambridge LLP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Thomas Guise company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cambridge LLP company.

In the current year, Thomas Guise company and Cambridge LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Thomas Guise company nor Cambridge LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Thomas Guise company nor Cambridge LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Thomas Guise company nor Cambridge LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cambridge LLP company nor Thomas Guise company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cambridge LLP nor Thomas Guise holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Thomas Guise company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Cambridge LLP company.

Cambridge LLP company employs more people globally than Thomas Guise company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Cambridge LLP nor Thomas Guise holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cambridge LLP nor Thomas Guise holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cambridge LLP nor Thomas Guise holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cambridge LLP nor Thomas Guise holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cambridge LLP nor Thomas Guise holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cambridge LLP nor Thomas Guise holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X