Comparison Overview

Cambridge Flexible Learning

VS

Onfit Training College

Cambridge Flexible Learning

Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, GB, CB24
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Cambridge Flexible Learning [CFL] is a trading name of Anderson Associates [L & D]. CFL operates at individual, team and organisation levels, specialising in an holistic approach to Human Resource Development, which is fundamental to building the capacity to minimise decline and maximise effectiveness within changing markets. Our belief is that organisational, team and individual success, and indeed survival, depends on the capacity to change and the ability to adapt and adopt to innovation and new practices within the working environment. For individuals, teams and organisations our composite, more holistic idea of learning encompasses: > The skills and knowledge (S&K) required, > The application of these (S&K) . > Aligning them (S&K) to the social skills of individuals / teams > Aligning their interactive skills with others in the organisational team > Improving and sharpening problem-solving skills. > Developing a spectrum of learning from core or basic skills to more abstract knowledge and skills of conceptualisation. Our approach encourages learning and development and the embracing of change as a positive challenge and reflects our belief that individuals, teams and organisations have an infinite capacity to learn and adapt to change both nationally and globally.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 0
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Onfit Training College

Level 6, PCYC, Milton, QLD, 4064, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

Onfit Training College is a premier accredited online health and fitness college, delivering a range of specialist and Nationally Accredited courses. Our team is extremely passionate about providing our students with an engaging and enjoyable experience, ensuring they are equipped with the skills and opportunities to succeed with their career goals. To speak with our team of tutors, admin staff and career advisors contact us on 1300 557 637. RTO Code: 32107 Accredited Courses: SIS30321 - Certificate III in Fitness SIS40221 - Certificate IV in Fitness 10859NAT - Certificate IV in Weight Management 10698NAT - Diploma of Weight Management HLT43015 - Certificate IV in Allied Health Assistance

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cambridge-flexible-learning.jpeg
Cambridge Flexible Learning
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/onfit.jpeg
Onfit Training College
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cambridge Flexible Learning
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Onfit Training College
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs E-learning Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cambridge Flexible Learning in 2025.

Incidents vs E-learning Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Onfit Training College in 2025.

Incident History — Cambridge Flexible Learning (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cambridge Flexible Learning cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Onfit Training College (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Onfit Training College cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cambridge-flexible-learning.jpeg
Cambridge Flexible Learning
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/onfit.jpeg
Onfit Training College
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cambridge Flexible Learning company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Onfit Training College company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Onfit Training College company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cambridge Flexible Learning company.

In the current year, Onfit Training College company and Cambridge Flexible Learning company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Onfit Training College company nor Cambridge Flexible Learning company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Onfit Training College company nor Cambridge Flexible Learning company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Onfit Training College company nor Cambridge Flexible Learning company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cambridge Flexible Learning company nor Onfit Training College company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cambridge Flexible Learning nor Onfit Training College holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cambridge Flexible Learning company nor Onfit Training College company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Onfit Training College company employs more people globally than Cambridge Flexible Learning company, reflecting its scale as a E-learning.

Neither Cambridge Flexible Learning nor Onfit Training College holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cambridge Flexible Learning nor Onfit Training College holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cambridge Flexible Learning nor Onfit Training College holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cambridge Flexible Learning nor Onfit Training College holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cambridge Flexible Learning nor Onfit Training College holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cambridge Flexible Learning nor Onfit Training College holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

HedgeDoc is an open source, real-time, collaborative, markdown notes application. Prior to 1.10.4, some of HedgeDoc's OAuth2 endpoints for social login providers such as Google, GitHub, GitLab, Facebook or Dropbox lack CSRF protection, since they don't send a state parameter and verify the response using this parameter. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.10.4.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Langflow versions up to and including 1.6.9 contain a chained vulnerability that enables account takeover and remote code execution. An overly permissive CORS configuration (allow_origins='*' with allow_credentials=True) combined with a refresh token cookie configured as SameSite=None allows a malicious webpage to perform cross-origin requests that include credentials and successfully call the refresh endpoint. An attacker-controlled origin can therefore obtain fresh access_token / refresh_token pairs for a victim session. Obtained tokens permit access to authenticated endpoints — including built-in code-execution functionality — allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code and achieve full system compromise.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was detected in xerrors Yuxi-Know up to 0.4.0. This vulnerability affects the function OtherEmbedding.aencode of the file /src/models/embed.py. Performing manipulation of the argument health_url results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The patch is named 0ff771dc1933d5a6b78f804115e78a7d8625c3f3. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. The vendor responded with a vulnerability confirmation and a list of security measures they have established already (e.g. disabled URL parsing, disabled URL upload mode, removed URL-to-markdown conversion).

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Rarlab RAR App up to 7.11 Build 127 on Android. This affects an unknown part of the component com.rarlab.rar. Such manipulation leads to path traversal. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Attacks of this nature are highly complex. It is indicated that the exploitability is difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. Upgrading to version 7.20 build 128 is able to mitigate this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor responded very professional: "This is the real vulnerability affecting RAR for Android only. WinRAR and Unix RAR versions are not affected. We already fixed it in RAR for Android 7.20 build 128 and we publicly mentioned it in that version changelog. (...) To avoid confusion among users, it would be useful if such disclosure emphasizes that it is RAR for Android only issue and WinRAR isn't affected."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in ZSPACE Q2C NAS up to 1.1.0210050. Affected by this issue is the function zfilev2_api.OpenSafe of the file /v2/file/safe/open of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. This manipulation of the argument safe_dir causes command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 9.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X