Comparison Overview

Cambridge Flexible Learning

VS

Laragh Courseware

Cambridge Flexible Learning

Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, GB, CB24
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Cambridge Flexible Learning [CFL] is a trading name of Anderson Associates [L & D]. CFL operates at individual, team and organisation levels, specialising in an holistic approach to Human Resource Development, which is fundamental to building the capacity to minimise decline and maximise effectiveness within changing markets. Our belief is that organisational, team and individual success, and indeed survival, depends on the capacity to change and the ability to adapt and adopt to innovation and new practices within the working environment. For individuals, teams and organisations our composite, more holistic idea of learning encompasses: > The skills and knowledge (S&K) required, > The application of these (S&K) . > Aligning them (S&K) to the social skills of individuals / teams > Aligning their interactive skills with others in the organisational team > Improving and sharpening problem-solving skills. > Developing a spectrum of learning from core or basic skills to more abstract knowledge and skills of conceptualisation. Our approach encourages learning and development and the embracing of change as a positive challenge and reflects our belief that individuals, teams and organisations have an infinite capacity to learn and adapt to change both nationally and globally.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 0
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Laragh Courseware

301 Newspaper House,, Cape Town, 8001, ZA
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 800 and 849

Laragh Courseware develops web based training of exceptional quality. Its products meet the increasing worldwide need for e-learning focusing on technical skills and organizational competencies. Since 1996 Laragh has produced more than 20,000 presold and bespoke e-learning titles. Its principal clients include world leaders in ICT- and business-related e-learning. To produce the best courseware possible, Laragh maintains teams of expert developers with a broad range of educational, instructional design, ICT, e-learning, multimedia, and graphic design skills.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cambridge-flexible-learning.jpeg
Cambridge Flexible Learning
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/laragh-courseware.jpeg
Laragh Courseware
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cambridge Flexible Learning
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Laragh Courseware
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs E-learning Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cambridge Flexible Learning in 2025.

Incidents vs E-learning Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Laragh Courseware in 2025.

Incident History — Cambridge Flexible Learning (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cambridge Flexible Learning cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Laragh Courseware (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Laragh Courseware cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cambridge-flexible-learning.jpeg
Cambridge Flexible Learning
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/laragh-courseware.jpeg
Laragh Courseware
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Laragh Courseware company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cambridge Flexible Learning company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Laragh Courseware company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cambridge Flexible Learning company.

In the current year, Laragh Courseware company and Cambridge Flexible Learning company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Laragh Courseware company nor Cambridge Flexible Learning company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Laragh Courseware company nor Cambridge Flexible Learning company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Laragh Courseware company nor Cambridge Flexible Learning company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cambridge Flexible Learning company nor Laragh Courseware company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cambridge Flexible Learning nor Laragh Courseware holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cambridge Flexible Learning company nor Laragh Courseware company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Laragh Courseware company employs more people globally than Cambridge Flexible Learning company, reflecting its scale as a E-learning.

Neither Cambridge Flexible Learning nor Laragh Courseware holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cambridge Flexible Learning nor Laragh Courseware holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cambridge Flexible Learning nor Laragh Courseware holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cambridge Flexible Learning nor Laragh Courseware holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cambridge Flexible Learning nor Laragh Courseware holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cambridge Flexible Learning nor Laragh Courseware holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

HedgeDoc is an open source, real-time, collaborative, markdown notes application. Prior to 1.10.4, some of HedgeDoc's OAuth2 endpoints for social login providers such as Google, GitHub, GitLab, Facebook or Dropbox lack CSRF protection, since they don't send a state parameter and verify the response using this parameter. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.10.4.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Langflow versions up to and including 1.6.9 contain a chained vulnerability that enables account takeover and remote code execution. An overly permissive CORS configuration (allow_origins='*' with allow_credentials=True) combined with a refresh token cookie configured as SameSite=None allows a malicious webpage to perform cross-origin requests that include credentials and successfully call the refresh endpoint. An attacker-controlled origin can therefore obtain fresh access_token / refresh_token pairs for a victim session. Obtained tokens permit access to authenticated endpoints — including built-in code-execution functionality — allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code and achieve full system compromise.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was detected in xerrors Yuxi-Know up to 0.4.0. This vulnerability affects the function OtherEmbedding.aencode of the file /src/models/embed.py. Performing manipulation of the argument health_url results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The patch is named 0ff771dc1933d5a6b78f804115e78a7d8625c3f3. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. The vendor responded with a vulnerability confirmation and a list of security measures they have established already (e.g. disabled URL parsing, disabled URL upload mode, removed URL-to-markdown conversion).

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Rarlab RAR App up to 7.11 Build 127 on Android. This affects an unknown part of the component com.rarlab.rar. Such manipulation leads to path traversal. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Attacks of this nature are highly complex. It is indicated that the exploitability is difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. Upgrading to version 7.20 build 128 is able to mitigate this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor responded very professional: "This is the real vulnerability affecting RAR for Android only. WinRAR and Unix RAR versions are not affected. We already fixed it in RAR for Android 7.20 build 128 and we publicly mentioned it in that version changelog. (...) To avoid confusion among users, it would be useful if such disclosure emphasizes that it is RAR for Android only issue and WinRAR isn't affected."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in ZSPACE Q2C NAS up to 1.1.0210050. Affected by this issue is the function zfilev2_api.OpenSafe of the file /v2/file/safe/open of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. This manipulation of the argument safe_dir causes command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 9.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X