Comparison Overview

Cambridge Film Festival

VS

Image Engine Design Inc.

Cambridge Film Festival

Cambridge Film Trust, Cambridge, undefined, CB2 3AR, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-18

First established in 1977, the Cambridge Film Festival has been committed to delivering high quality independent films to the widest possible audience. Bold and imaginative in its presentation of films, the Festival embraces the latest technology, while also showcasing its passion for the heritage of cinema. Since 2007, the Festival has been run by a registered charity, the Cambridge Film Trust, as the highlight of a year-round programme of events that aim to bring challenging and provocative cinema to Cambridge and the Eastern region. At the Festival we champion new methods of filmmaking and emerging platforms of distribution. Through our open submissions process, we support filmmakers from all across the globe as well as locally, providing a platform for new talents to showcase their work. Over the years we have selected titles by filmmakers who have gone on to achieve international acclaim, including a student short 'Larceny'​ from Batman director Christopher Nolan (1996) and the Oscar-winning 'Wasp'​ by Andrea Arnold (2006).

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Image Engine Design Inc.

2043 Quebec St, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5T 2Z6, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-20
Between 750 and 799

World-class visual effects for feature films and television since 1995. Based in Vancouver BC, Image Engine is a world-class visual effects studio led by a team of creative and passionate individuals who are committed to furthering the art of visual storytelling. We offer a full range of visual effects services from concept designs and pre-visualization to computer-generated animation, compositing, and explosive volumetric digital effects.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 241
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cambridge-film-festival.jpeg
Cambridge Film Festival
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/image-engine-design-inc-.jpeg
Image Engine Design Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cambridge Film Festival
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Image Engine Design Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Movies, Videos, and Sound Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cambridge Film Festival in 2025.

Incidents vs Movies, Videos, and Sound Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Image Engine Design Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Cambridge Film Festival (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cambridge Film Festival cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Image Engine Design Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Image Engine Design Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cambridge-film-festival.jpeg
Cambridge Film Festival
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/image-engine-design-inc-.jpeg
Image Engine Design Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Image Engine Design Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cambridge Film Festival company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Image Engine Design Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cambridge Film Festival company.

In the current year, Image Engine Design Inc. company and Cambridge Film Festival company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Image Engine Design Inc. company nor Cambridge Film Festival company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Image Engine Design Inc. company nor Cambridge Film Festival company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Image Engine Design Inc. company nor Cambridge Film Festival company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cambridge Film Festival company nor Image Engine Design Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cambridge Film Festival nor Image Engine Design Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cambridge Film Festival company nor Image Engine Design Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Image Engine Design Inc. company employs more people globally than Cambridge Film Festival company, reflecting its scale as a Movies, Videos, and Sound.

Neither Cambridge Film Festival nor Image Engine Design Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cambridge Film Festival nor Image Engine Design Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cambridge Film Festival nor Image Engine Design Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cambridge Film Festival nor Image Engine Design Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cambridge Film Festival nor Image Engine Design Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cambridge Film Festival nor Image Engine Design Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N