Comparison Overview

Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium

VS

ROMU

Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium

3450 Ortiz Avenue, Fort Myers, FL, 33905, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.calusanature.org

Calusa Nature Center is a non-profit organization that seeks to educate the public on wildlife, rehabilitated wildlife, water conservation, and other nature-related conservation and education. The nature center has programs for adults and children and is seeking to expand and update the musuem, exhibits, animal exhibits, planetarium, add other community activities and increase community involvement. The nature center is in dire need of volunteers and donations.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

ROMU

Munkebro 2, Roskilde, 4000, DK
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.romu.dk

Museumsorganisationen ROMU har sit udspring i Roskilde Museum, som blev etableret i 1929. ROMU udgøres i dag af Roskilde Museum, Frederikssund Museum, Lejre Museum, RAGNAROCK - museet for pop, rock og ungdomskultur, Lützhøfts Købmandsgård (herunder Håndværkemuseet), Sankt Laurentius, Tadre Mølle og Domkirkemuseet ved Roskilde Domkirke. ROMU er en statsanerkendt kulturhistorisk museumsorganisation, som bl.a. undersøger, indsamler og formidler kulturarven i Roskilde, Lejre, Frederikssund og Egedal kommuner, samt er et af 10 museer, der på landsplan, er blevet udpeget af Slots- og Kulturstyrelsen til at varetage tilsynet med landets fredede fortidsminder. ROMU forestår tilsynet i det centrale og vestlige Sjælland. Derudover har ROMU ledelsesansvaret for arbejdet med verdensarv i fondsorganisationen bag kulturarven ved Roskilde Domkirke. ROMU er arbejdsplads for omkring 100 højt specialiserede museumsansatte, fordelt på knap 60 årsværk.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 171
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/calusa-nature-center.jpeg
Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museumskoncernen-romu.jpeg
ROMU
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ROMU
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ROMU in 2026.

Incident History — Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ROMU (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ROMU cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/calusa-nature-center.jpeg
Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museumskoncernen-romu.jpeg
ROMU
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ROMU company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ROMU company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium company.

In the current year, ROMU company and Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ROMU company nor Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ROMU company nor Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ROMU company nor Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium company nor ROMU company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium nor ROMU holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium company nor ROMU company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ROMU company employs more people globally than Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium nor ROMU holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium nor ROMU holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium nor ROMU holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium nor ROMU holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium nor ROMU holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium nor ROMU holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References