Comparison Overview

California Strategies

VS

Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston

California Strategies

980 Ninth Street, Sacramento, CA, 95814, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

CALIFORNIA STRATEGIES, LLC is a full-service public affairs consulting firm dedicated to successfully navigating clients through the myriad pathways of California's political, legislative, regulatory, and media environments. Founded by Bob White in 1997, California Strategies is where experience and expertise converge to achieve winning, measurable results. With ten offices statewide and 27 full-time principals - all widely recognized at the apex of their individual fields, all with accomplished backgrounds in every level of local, state and federal government, as well as the private sector - our companies offer strategic consulting, public policy analysis, issue management, media relations, legislative and regulatory advocacy and communications planning and implementation necessary to achieve any strategic objective in a nation-state as diverse and dynamic as the State of California..

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 63
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston

126 High St, Boston, Massachusetts, 02110, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

JCRC’s purpose is to define and advance the values, interests and priorities of the organized Jewish community of Greater Boston in the public square. To achieve our shared values effectively, JCRC and the Greater Boston Jewish community work toward a strong infrastructure of community relations, articulated through building our community’s connection and commitment to civil society, developing the next generation of Jewish leaders, weaving a strong network of Jewish organizations, and investing in deep ties with actors in the public square.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/california-strategies.jpeg
California Strategies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jcrcboston.jpeg
Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
California Strategies
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for California Strategies in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston in 2025.

Incident History — California Strategies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

California Strategies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/california-strategies.jpeg
California Strategies
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jcrcboston.jpeg
Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

California Strategies company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to California Strategies company.

In the current year, Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston company and California Strategies company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston company nor California Strategies company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston company nor California Strategies company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston company nor California Strategies company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither California Strategies company nor Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither California Strategies nor Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither California Strategies company nor Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

California Strategies company employs more people globally than Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither California Strategies nor Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither California Strategies nor Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither California Strategies nor Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither California Strategies nor Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither California Strategies nor Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston holds HIPAA certification.

Neither California Strategies nor Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N