Comparison Overview

California Special Districts Association

VS

State of the Future

California Special Districts Association

1112 I St, Sacramento, California, 95814, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

The California Special Districts Association (CSDA) is a 501c(6), not-for-profit association that was formed in 1969 to promote good governance and improved core local services through professional development, advocacy, and other services for all types of independent special districts. For over 40 years, CSDA has been offering its members cost-efficient programs and representation at the State Capitol and boasts a membership of over 1,000 organizations throughout California. We are the only statewide association representing all types of independent special districts including irrigation, water, park and recreation, cemetery, fire, police protection, library, utility, harbor, healthcare and community services districts…just to name a few. CSDA provides education and training, insurance programs, legal advice, industry-wide litigation and public relations support, legislative advocacy, capital improvement and equipment funding, collateral design services, and, most importantly, current information that is crucial to a special districts management and operational effectiveness.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

State of the Future

None, None, Austin, Texas, US, None
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

The “State of the Future” mission is centered on ensuring Texas leads with Industry 4.0 by supporting broad collaboration with diverse industries, establishing the continuum of capital, and deploying the intelligent infrastructure that enables it. The purpose is to have a unified plan that will accelerate the path to commerce for companies, generate jobs, and support the boom of economic growth within our communities. The coalition will act as a catalyst and will rely heavily on the established organizations and leadership within the state. Programs will be built around; leadership, jobs, economic development, capital, infrastructure, research, and national priorities.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/california-special-districts-association.jpeg
California Special Districts Association
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/state-of-the-future.jpeg
State of the Future
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
California Special Districts Association
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
State of the Future
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for California Special Districts Association in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for State of the Future in 2025.

Incident History — California Special Districts Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

California Special Districts Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — State of the Future (X = Date, Y = Severity)

State of the Future cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/california-special-districts-association.jpeg
California Special Districts Association
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/state-of-the-future.jpeg
State of the Future
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

California Special Districts Association company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to State of the Future company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, State of the Future company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to California Special Districts Association company.

In the current year, State of the Future company and California Special Districts Association company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither State of the Future company nor California Special Districts Association company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither State of the Future company nor California Special Districts Association company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither State of the Future company nor California Special Districts Association company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither California Special Districts Association company nor State of the Future company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither California Special Districts Association nor State of the Future holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither California Special Districts Association company nor State of the Future company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

California Special Districts Association company employs more people globally than State of the Future company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither California Special Districts Association nor State of the Future holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither California Special Districts Association nor State of the Future holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither California Special Districts Association nor State of the Future holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither California Special Districts Association nor State of the Future holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither California Special Districts Association nor State of the Future holds HIPAA certification.

Neither California Special Districts Association nor State of the Future holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N