Comparison Overview

California Forward

VS

Growth Lancashire

California Forward

undefined, Sacramento, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

California Forward (CA FWD) is a multi-partisan, non-profit organization building a New California Economy that is sustainable, resilient, and inclusive. We support economic growth using a regions-up approach, stewarding state resources, and building resilience in the face of a changing climate. This ongoing work is done in collaboration with diverse partners—including our California Stewardship Network and leaders from business, community, government, labor, and more. We convene annually at our California Economic Summit, where we work with these partners and others to continue improving and developing programs, policies, resources, and solutions for a truly sustainable economic model.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Growth Lancashire

The Globe Centre, Accrington, BB5 0RE, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Growth Lancashire is a unique partnership vehicle, owned by several local authorities and operating across the county to drive inclusive growth and collaboration. We deliver a diverse range of services focused on: Supporting business growth and simplifying access to support Protecting and enhancing Lancashire’s heritage and environmental assets Securing and delivering external funding Promoting Lancashire as a place to invest, live and thrive As a trusted delivery partner, we provide capacity and expertise to local authorities and a wide range of stakeholders, including private sector clients. Our work spans council boundaries, enabling faster results, better value for money, and greater coordination. Our Board is led by the private sector and includes influential business leaders and elected members from across Lancashire. Together, we believe in the power of partnership to unlock the county’s full potential. We are proud delivery partners of Boost – Lancashire’s Business Growth Hub, and part of the Northern Powerhouse Partners Programme. With over 15 years of experience, Growth Lancashire is committed to growing productivity, prosperity, and places across the county—helping Lancashire capitalise on its economic strengths and its rich built and natural environment.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/california-forward.jpeg
California Forward
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/growth-lancashire.jpeg
Growth Lancashire
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
California Forward
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Growth Lancashire
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for California Forward in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Growth Lancashire in 2025.

Incident History — California Forward (X = Date, Y = Severity)

California Forward cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Growth Lancashire (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Growth Lancashire cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/california-forward.jpeg
California Forward
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/growth-lancashire.jpeg
Growth Lancashire
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both California Forward company and Growth Lancashire company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Growth Lancashire company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to California Forward company.

In the current year, Growth Lancashire company and California Forward company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Growth Lancashire company nor California Forward company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Growth Lancashire company nor California Forward company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Growth Lancashire company nor California Forward company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither California Forward company nor Growth Lancashire company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither California Forward nor Growth Lancashire holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither California Forward company nor Growth Lancashire company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Growth Lancashire company employs more people globally than California Forward company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither California Forward nor Growth Lancashire holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither California Forward nor Growth Lancashire holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither California Forward nor Growth Lancashire holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither California Forward nor Growth Lancashire holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither California Forward nor Growth Lancashire holds HIPAA certification.

Neither California Forward nor Growth Lancashire holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H