Comparison Overview

California Department of Social Services

VS

GSA

California Department of Social Services

744 P Street, None, Sacramento, California, US, 95814
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.cdss.ca.gov/

The California Department of Social Services supports programs which serve more than eight million people across our state. This work, accomplished everyday, provides stability, opportunity and promotes wellness in communities throughout California. Come join our team to experience what it is like to enjoy 'Work With a Purpose'​. Our Mission: "The mission of the California Department of Social Services is to serve, protect, and support the people of California experiencing need in ways that empower wellbeing and disrupt systemic inequities."​

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 1,992
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
1
View Profile

GSA

1800 F St. NW, Washington, D.C., US, 20405
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gsa.gov

General Services Administration (GSA) is an independent agency of the United States government established in 1949 to help manage and support the basic functioning of federal agencies. Our organization includes the Public Buildings Service (PBS), Federal Acquisition Service (FAS), and a variety of Service and Staff Offices. Learn more about our organization at gsa.gov. Our Mission GSA's mission is to deliver value and savings in real estate, acquisition, technology, and other mission-support services across government. Our Vision Effective and efficient government for the American people. Our Values Service, Accountability, and Innovation ----------- You can also find us on these social media sites: Twitter: https://twitter.com/usgsa Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/GSA/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/usgsa/

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 13,462
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gsa.jpeg
GSA
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
California Department of Social Services
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
GSA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for California Department of Social Services in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GSA in 2025.

Incident History — California Department of Social Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

California Department of Social Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — GSA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GSA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/california-department-of-social-services.jpeg
California Department of Social Services
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email
Motivation: Accidental
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gsa.jpeg
GSA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

GSA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to California Department of Social Services company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

California Department of Social Services company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas GSA company has not reported any.

In the current year, GSA company and California Department of Social Services company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither GSA company nor California Department of Social Services company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

California Department of Social Services company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other GSA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither GSA company nor California Department of Social Services company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither California Department of Social Services company nor GSA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither California Department of Social Services nor GSA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

GSA company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to California Department of Social Services company.

GSA company employs more people globally than California Department of Social Services company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither California Department of Social Services nor GSA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither California Department of Social Services nor GSA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither California Department of Social Services nor GSA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither California Department of Social Services nor GSA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither California Department of Social Services nor GSA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither California Department of Social Services nor GSA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.

Published
Date
2025-12-10
Updated
Date
2025-12-10
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Published
Date
2025-12-10
Updated
Date
2025-12-10
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Published
Date
2025-12-10
Updated
Date
2025-12-10
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.

Published
Date
2025-12-10
Updated
Date
2025-12-10
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
References
Description

The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.

Published
Date
2025-12-10
Updated
Date
2025-12-10
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
References