Comparison Overview

California Department of Health Care Services

VS

City of Los Angeles

California Department of Health Care Services

1501 Capitol Ave., Sacramento, California, US, 95814
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://linktr.ee/DHCS_CA

The California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) is the backbone of California’s health care safety net, helping millions of low-income and disabled Californians every day. The department is dedicated to providing Californians with access to affordable, high-quality health care, including medical, dental, mental health, substance use disorder services, and long-term care services. DHCS is a dynamic department with ambitious goals and a talented, committed staff. We work hard each day to fulfill our vital responsibility to support the delivery of quality health care to Californians. Our department constantly seeks highly-qualified candidates. Visit our website for more career opportunity resources: https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/services/admin/jobs/Pages/default.aspx For additional information regarding examinations and how to obtain a job in State service, please visit: www.jobs.ca.gov

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 2,330
Subsidiaries: 29
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
28
Attack type number
3
View Profile

City of Los Angeles

200 North Spring St., Los Angeles, California, US, 90012
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
https://linkpages.pro/CityLAJobs

The City of Los Angeles employs more than 45,000 people in a wide range of careers. Visit our website for information on current openings, including regular civil service positions, exempt and emergency appointment opportunities, in addition to internships! The City of Los Angeles is a Mayor-Council-Commission form of government, as originally adopted by voters of the City of Los Angeles, effective July 1, 1925, and reaffirmed by a new Charter effective July 1, 2000. A Mayor, City Controller, and City Attorney are elected by City residents every four years. Fifteen City Council members representing fifteen districts are elected by the people for four-year terms, for a maximum of two terms. Members of Commissions are generally appointed by the Mayor, subject to the approval of the City Council. General Managers of the various City departments are also appointed by the Mayor, subject to confirmation by the City Council. Most employees of the City are subject to the civil service provisions of the City Charter.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 15,569
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/california-department-of-health-care-services.jpeg
California Department of Health Care Services
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-los-angeles.jpeg
City of Los Angeles
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
California Department of Health Care Services
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
City of Los Angeles
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for California Department of Health Care Services in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for City of Los Angeles in 2025.

Incident History — California Department of Health Care Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

California Department of Health Care Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — City of Los Angeles (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Los Angeles cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/california-department-of-health-care-services.jpeg
California Department of Health Care Services
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Inadvertent Email
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Dissemination
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-los-angeles.jpeg
City of Los Angeles
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

City of Los Angeles company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to California Department of Health Care Services company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

California Department of Health Care Services company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas City of Los Angeles company has not reported any.

In the current year, California Department of Health Care Services company has reported more cyber incidents than City of Los Angeles company.

California Department of Health Care Services company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while City of Los Angeles company has not reported such incidents publicly.

California Department of Health Care Services company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other City of Los Angeles company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither City of Los Angeles company nor California Department of Health Care Services company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither California Department of Health Care Services company nor City of Los Angeles company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither California Department of Health Care Services nor City of Los Angeles holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

California Department of Health Care Services company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to City of Los Angeles company.

City of Los Angeles company employs more people globally than California Department of Health Care Services company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither California Department of Health Care Services nor City of Los Angeles holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither California Department of Health Care Services nor City of Los Angeles holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither California Department of Health Care Services nor City of Los Angeles holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither California Department of Health Care Services nor City of Los Angeles holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither California Department of Health Care Services nor City of Los Angeles holds HIPAA certification.

Neither California Department of Health Care Services nor City of Los Angeles holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.

Published
Date
2025-12-10
Updated
Date
2025-12-10
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Published
Date
2025-12-10
Updated
Date
2025-12-10
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Published
Date
2025-12-10
Updated
Date
2025-12-10
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.

Published
Date
2025-12-10
Updated
Date
2025-12-10
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
References
Description

The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.

Published
Date
2025-12-10
Updated
Date
2025-12-10
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
References