Comparison Overview

California Child Support Services

VS

Transportation Security Administration (TSA)

California Child Support Services

Rancho Cordova, CA , US
Last Update: 2025-12-09

California Child Support Services is a group of dedicated individuals working with parents and guardians to help children and families receive court-ordered financial and medical support through a network of 50 county and regional local child support agencies. Some of the services provided include locating a parent; establishing paternity; establishing, modifying and enforcing a court order for child support; and establishing, modifying and enforcing an order for health coverage.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 200
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
1

Transportation Security Administration (TSA)

601 12th Street South, None, Arlington, Virginia, US, 22202
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is a component agency of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), committed to securing the nation’s transportation systems to ensure safe and efficient travel for all. Our mission is to protect the American people by preventing threats and disruptions in the transportation sector, while enhancing the overall passenger experience. 🔹 Mission: Safeguard transportation systems and prevent security threats 🔹 Vision: Achieve a secure and resilient transportation network 🔹 Values: Integrity, Excellence, Accountability, and Innovation More than 60,000 people around the world make up #TeamTSA and ensure the safety of millions of people each day as they travel by plane, train, automobile or ferry. From the officers you see on the frontlines to our cybersecurity and mission support teams, we’re working hard to combat evolving threats and keep you safe. Join us in our commitment to a more secure travel experience. For more information, visit tsa.gov.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 16,759
Subsidiaries: 28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
11
Attack type number
5

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/california-child-support-services.jpeg
California Child Support Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tsa.jpeg
Transportation Security Administration (TSA)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
California Child Support Services
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Transportation Security Administration (TSA)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

California Child Support Services has 23.46% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Transportation Security Administration (TSA) in 2025.

Incident History — California Child Support Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

California Child Support Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Transportation Security Administration (TSA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Transportation Security Administration (TSA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/california-child-support-services.jpeg
California Child Support Services
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Inadvertent Email
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2014
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Physical Theft/Loss
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tsa.jpeg
Transportation Security Administration (TSA)
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Breach
Motivation: Financial Gain (e.g., unauthorized loans, employment fraud, government benefits fraud)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Citrix Remote Access Software, Lateral Movement, Privilege Escalation
Motivation: Espionage, Data Theft, Potential Sabotage
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Citrix Remote Access Software, Lateral Movement within Network
Motivation: Espionage, Data Theft
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to California Child Support Services company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to California Child Support Services company.

In the current year, Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company has reported more cyber incidents than California Child Support Services company.

Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while California Child Support Services company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company and California Child Support Services company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while California Child Support Services company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while California Child Support Services company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither California Child Support Services nor Transportation Security Administration (TSA) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to California Child Support Services company.

Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company employs more people globally than California Child Support Services company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither California Child Support Services nor Transportation Security Administration (TSA) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither California Child Support Services nor Transportation Security Administration (TSA) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither California Child Support Services nor Transportation Security Administration (TSA) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither California Child Support Services nor Transportation Security Administration (TSA) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither California Child Support Services nor Transportation Security Administration (TSA) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither California Child Support Services nor Transportation Security Administration (TSA) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N