Comparison Overview

California Child Support Services

VS

Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)

California Child Support Services

Rancho Cordova, CA , US
Last Update: 2025-12-09

California Child Support Services is a group of dedicated individuals working with parents and guardians to help children and families receive court-ordered financial and medical support through a network of 50 county and regional local child support agencies. Some of the services provided include locating a parent; establishing paternity; establishing, modifying and enforcing a court order for child support; and establishing, modifying and enforcing an order for health coverage.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 200
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
1

Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)

Caxton House, London, SW1H 9NA, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-09

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is the UK’s largest government department and is responsible for welfare, pensions and child maintenance policy. It administers the State Pension and a range of working age, disability and ill health benefits, serving around 20 million customers. DWP is responsible for • understanding and dealing with the causes of poverty rather than its symptoms • encouraging people to work and making work pay • encouraging disabled people and those with ill health to work and be independent • providing a decent income for people of pension age and promoting saving for retirement • providing value for money and reducing levels of fraud and error • reducing work-related death and serious injury in workplaces through the Health and Safety Executive DWP is a fast paced organisation which puts leadership at the centre of its transformation journey. The majority of DWP colleagues are part of the Operational Delivery Profession (ODP) – providing customer service to DWP’s 20 million customers across the UK. ODP is a thriving, inclusive professional community that supports colleagues and encourages them to learn, develop, grow and progress in their career to reach their full potential.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 32,061
Subsidiaries: 69
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
16
Attack type number
4

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/california-child-support-services.jpeg
California Child Support Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dwp.jpeg
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
California Child Support Services
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

California Child Support Services has 23.46% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) in 2025.

Incident History — California Child Support Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

California Child Support Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/california-child-support-services.jpeg
California Child Support Services
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Inadvertent Email
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2014
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Physical Theft/Loss
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dwp.jpeg
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Physical Exposure, Negligence, Insecure Work Practices
Motivation: None (Unintentional)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: third-party compromise (Dodd Group), gateway attack, phishing (likely), dark web data exfiltration
Motivation: financial gain (ransom threats), espionage, geopolitical disruption, reputation damage
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to California Child Support Services company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to California Child Support Services company.

In the current year, Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) company has reported more cyber incidents than California Child Support Services company.

Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while California Child Support Services company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) company and California Child Support Services company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while California Child Support Services company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while California Child Support Services company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither California Child Support Services nor Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to California Child Support Services company.

Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) company employs more people globally than California Child Support Services company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither California Child Support Services nor Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither California Child Support Services nor Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither California Child Support Services nor Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither California Child Support Services nor Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither California Child Support Services nor Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither California Child Support Services nor Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N