Comparison Overview

Calandra Design

VS

Zomer Op Zaterdag

Calandra Design

None
Last Update: 2025-12-03

With over 24 years of industry experience, we’re a trusted creative agency dedicated to transforming businesses into engaging, visually captivating digital experiences. Specializing in Website Development, Graphic Design, Motion Graphics, SEO, and Social Media Marketing, we bring a wealth of knowledge and creativity to every project. From startups to established brands, we partner with you to drive growth and build authentic connections with your audience, helping you make a meaningful impact in the digital landscape.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Zomer Op Zaterdag

Spoorstraat 55G Boxmeer, Brabant 5831 CJ, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-02

Zomer Op Zaterdag is een grafisch ontwerpbureau, ijzersterk in het ontwerpen van alles wat een bedrijf nodig heeft om zichzelf te onderscheiden van de concurrent. Dit doen wij door ons te richten op dat waar uw klant naar op zoek is. Door de juiste beleving te geven bij uw product zal u uw klanten bereiken voor de langere termijn. Vrijblijvend een afspraak maken? U bent van harte welkom!

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/calandra-design.jpeg
Calandra Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zomer-op-zaterdag.jpeg
Zomer Op Zaterdag
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Calandra Design
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Zomer Op Zaterdag
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Calandra Design in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zomer Op Zaterdag in 2025.

Incident History — Calandra Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Calandra Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Zomer Op Zaterdag (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zomer Op Zaterdag cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/calandra-design.jpeg
Calandra Design
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zomer-op-zaterdag.jpeg
Zomer Op Zaterdag
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Calandra Design company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Zomer Op Zaterdag company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Zomer Op Zaterdag company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Calandra Design company.

In the current year, Zomer Op Zaterdag company and Calandra Design company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Zomer Op Zaterdag company nor Calandra Design company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Zomer Op Zaterdag company nor Calandra Design company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Zomer Op Zaterdag company nor Calandra Design company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Calandra Design company nor Zomer Op Zaterdag company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Calandra Design nor Zomer Op Zaterdag holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Calandra Design company nor Zomer Op Zaterdag company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Calandra Design company employs more people globally than Zomer Op Zaterdag company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Calandra Design nor Zomer Op Zaterdag holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Calandra Design nor Zomer Op Zaterdag holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Calandra Design nor Zomer Op Zaterdag holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Calandra Design nor Zomer Op Zaterdag holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Calandra Design nor Zomer Op Zaterdag holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Calandra Design nor Zomer Op Zaterdag holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X