Comparison Overview

Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors

VS

Guardian IP Consulting

Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors

undefined, undefined, undefined, SW19 1QE, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Based in Wimbledon, South West London, Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors provides immigration law, employment law, conveyancing and litigation services to private clients and small business. The firm provides attentive, cost-effective legal services. In particular, we have an outstanding success rate in appeals before the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Guardian IP Consulting

Diplomvej, Building 381, Kgs. Lyngby, 2800, DK
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

VI GØR DET LETTERE FOR DIG Vi stræber altid efter at gøre hele processen med patent- og designbeskyttelse så enkel og gennemskuelig som overhovedet muligt. Vi er altid til at komme i kontakt med personligt og glæder os til at høre fra dig. De ofte komplicerede problemstillinger rådgiver vi om på en enkel og ligetil måde, og vi er ikke bange for at komme med en klar anbefaling. Dette sikrer, at du som kunde trygt kan træffe dine valg på et oplyst grundlag. Vi er ikke kun eksperter inden for IP-rettigheder og søger altid at basere vores rådgivning på en dybere forståelse af kundens forretning. Vi er et stort team af erfarne IP-professionelle der brænder for det vi gør, nemlig at rådgive dig og din virksomhed om alle aspekter af IP-rettigheder, sådan at du bedst muligt kan beskytte din tekniske udvikling. På den måde skaber vi reel værdi for vores kunder ved at sikre deres markedsandel og styrke konkurrenceevnen. -------------------------------------------------------- WE MAKE IT EASIER FOR YOU We strive to simplify and clarify the entire process of patent and design protection, as much as even possible. We are always reachable in person and look forward to hearing from you. We provide you with advice on the complex issues that often arise in a simple and straightforward manner, and we are not afraid to give you our considered recommendations. This ensures that you, as client, can confidently make your decisions on an informed basis. We are not only experts within IP rights but rather we always seek to base our advice on a deeper understanding of the client’s business. We are a large team of experienced IP professionals who are fully dedicated to the task of advising you and your business on every aspect of IP rights so that you can protect your technical development in the best possible way. Our goal is to create true value for our clients by safeguarding their market share and strengthening their competitive position.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cahill-de-fonseka-solicitors.jpeg
Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/guardian-ip-consulting.jpeg
Guardian IP Consulting
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Guardian IP Consulting
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Guardian IP Consulting in 2025.

Incident History — Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Guardian IP Consulting (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Guardian IP Consulting cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cahill-de-fonseka-solicitors.jpeg
Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/guardian-ip-consulting.jpeg
Guardian IP Consulting
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors company and Guardian IP Consulting company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Guardian IP Consulting company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors company.

In the current year, Guardian IP Consulting company and Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Guardian IP Consulting company nor Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Guardian IP Consulting company nor Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Guardian IP Consulting company nor Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors company nor Guardian IP Consulting company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors nor Guardian IP Consulting holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors company nor Guardian IP Consulting company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Guardian IP Consulting company employs more people globally than Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors nor Guardian IP Consulting holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors nor Guardian IP Consulting holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors nor Guardian IP Consulting holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors nor Guardian IP Consulting holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors nor Guardian IP Consulting holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors nor Guardian IP Consulting holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X