Comparison Overview

Cahaba Truck and Equipment

VS

CF Rail Services

Cahaba Truck and Equipment

10992 Commercial Dr , Tuscaloosa , Al, 35405, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

At Cahaba Truck, we have partnered with railroads, contractors and other suppliers across the nation to satisfy the demands of our customers. We believe delivering cost effective solutions and incorporating innovative designs and functionality are best achieved by developing a true partnership with each individual customer. Here, we use our experience in developing solutions that have been proven in the field, integrating the best and most cost-effective technology into a lower-cost, higher-value product.

NAICS: 336
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CF Rail Services

425 North Martingale Road, Schaumburg, 60173, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

CF Rail Services is a leading railcar repair and maintenance provider, offering quality running repair and program work for railroads, private car owners, lessors, contracts agents and shippers in North America. Its services include tank car services, railcar and locomotive repair, linings and coatings, railcar cleaning, testing and inspection services, a wheel shop and field services. CF Rail Services delivers the highest-quality repairs, speed and value to customers, while using technology to reinvent the industry.

NAICS: 3365
NAICS Definition: Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing
Employees: 61
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cahaba-truck-and-equipment.jpeg
Cahaba Truck and Equipment
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cf-rail-services.jpeg
CF Rail Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cahaba Truck and Equipment
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CF Rail Services
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cahaba Truck and Equipment in 2025.

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CF Rail Services in 2025.

Incident History — Cahaba Truck and Equipment (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cahaba Truck and Equipment cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CF Rail Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CF Rail Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cahaba-truck-and-equipment.jpeg
Cahaba Truck and Equipment
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cf-rail-services.jpeg
CF Rail Services
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Cahaba Truck and Equipment company and CF Rail Services company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, CF Rail Services company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cahaba Truck and Equipment company.

In the current year, CF Rail Services company and Cahaba Truck and Equipment company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CF Rail Services company nor Cahaba Truck and Equipment company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CF Rail Services company nor Cahaba Truck and Equipment company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CF Rail Services company nor Cahaba Truck and Equipment company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cahaba Truck and Equipment company nor CF Rail Services company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cahaba Truck and Equipment nor CF Rail Services holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

CF Rail Services company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Cahaba Truck and Equipment company.

CF Rail Services company employs more people globally than Cahaba Truck and Equipment company, reflecting its scale as a Railroad Equipment Manufacturing.

Neither Cahaba Truck and Equipment nor CF Rail Services holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cahaba Truck and Equipment nor CF Rail Services holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cahaba Truck and Equipment nor CF Rail Services holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cahaba Truck and Equipment nor CF Rail Services holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cahaba Truck and Equipment nor CF Rail Services holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cahaba Truck and Equipment nor CF Rail Services holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H