Comparison Overview

Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf

VS

Transportation Security Administration (TSA)

Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf

paris, FR
Last Update: 2025-12-18

Les Allocations familiales, c’est d’abord un réseau composé de la Caisse nationale d’Allocations familiales (Cnaf),composée de 11 sites, et de 101 Caf réparties sur tout le territoire français (Métropole et Outre-Mer). Les Caisses d’allocations familiales, plus connues par le grand public sous l’appellation Caf, sont des organismes de droit privé, investis d’une mission de service public. Aux côtés des familles, des couples et des personnes seules, notre ambition est de participer à la solidarité nationale et combattre la précarité. Nos missions : - Assister toutes les familles pour concilier vie familiale, professionnelle et sociale - Œuvrer pour un meilleur accès aux droits - Lutter contre les inégalités sociales et territoriales - Contribuer au développement de nouvelles structures - Favoriser la mixité sociale et lutter contre toute forme de discrimination Les Allocations familiales, ce sont aussi plus de 35 000 collaborateurs et une cinquantaine de métiers différents. Jeunes diplômés ou professionnels plus expérimentés, nous accueillons des profils aussi divers que variés. Nous croyons au talent et à la force collective de nos collaborateurs. En tant qu’employeur socialement responsable, nous mettons en œuvre des actions pour : - Garantir l’équité de traitement et l’égalité des chances - Donner du sens et améliorer les conditions de travail - Favoriser la conciliation vie professionnelle / vie personnelle - Assurer l’accès à la formation professionnelle tout au long de la carrière... Venez nous découvrir : politique employeur, diversité de nos métiers, actualités locales, conseils RH aux candidats... Les réseaux sociaux de la Caisse Nationale des Allocations Familiales et de l’ensemble des Caf, ne sont pas des relais d’échange sur vos dossiers d’allocataires. Nous vous prions donc, de ne transmettre aucun document ou information comprenant vos données personnelles.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 4,219
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Transportation Security Administration (TSA)

601 12th Street South, None, Arlington, Virginia, US, 22202
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is a component agency of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), committed to securing the nation’s transportation systems to ensure safe and efficient travel for all. Our mission is to protect the American people by preventing threats and disruptions in the transportation sector, while enhancing the overall passenger experience. 🔹 Mission: Safeguard transportation systems and prevent security threats 🔹 Vision: Achieve a secure and resilient transportation network 🔹 Values: Integrity, Excellence, Accountability, and Innovation More than 60,000 people around the world make up #TeamTSA and ensure the safety of millions of people each day as they travel by plane, train, automobile or ferry. From the officers you see on the frontlines to our cybersecurity and mission support teams, we’re working hard to combat evolving threats and keep you safe. Join us in our commitment to a more secure travel experience. For more information, visit tsa.gov.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 16,759
Subsidiaries: 28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
11
Attack type number
5

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/caf-allocations-familiales.jpeg
Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tsa.jpeg
Transportation Security Administration (TSA)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Transportation Security Administration (TSA)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf has 21.95% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Transportation Security Administration (TSA) in 2025.

Incident History — Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Transportation Security Administration (TSA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Transportation Security Administration (TSA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/caf-allocations-familiales.jpeg
Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Compromised employee personal accounts (alleged)
Motivation: Unknown (possibly financial gain or disruption)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tsa.jpeg
Transportation Security Administration (TSA)
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Breach
Motivation: Financial Gain (e.g., unauthorized loans, employment fraud, government benefits fraud)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Citrix Remote Access Software, Lateral Movement, Privilege Escalation
Motivation: Espionage, Data Theft, Potential Sabotage
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Citrix Remote Access Software, Lateral Movement within Network
Motivation: Espionage, Data Theft
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf company.

In the current year, Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company has reported more cyber incidents than Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf company.

Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company and Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf company have reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks.

Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf nor Transportation Security Administration (TSA) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf company.

Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company employs more people globally than Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf nor Transportation Security Administration (TSA) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf nor Transportation Security Administration (TSA) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf nor Transportation Security Administration (TSA) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf nor Transportation Security Administration (TSA) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf nor Transportation Security Administration (TSA) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf nor Transportation Security Administration (TSA) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L