Comparison Overview

Caesars Sportsbook & Casino

VS

eGaming Consulting

Caesars Sportsbook & Casino

6325 S RAINBOW BLVD, None, Las Vegas, Nevada, US, 89118
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Behold! Caesars Sportsbook & Casino is here, and we’re proud to be a part of Caesars Entertainment—the number one gaming company in the world with over 80 years of sports betting expertise. At Caesars Sportsbook & Casino, we believe all our Team Members should be treated like Caesars. It’s the mantra we were founded on, and the standard that drives us to provide our customers with best-in-class service. As we continue to Blaze The Trail with our Caesars Sportsbook & Casino app, the expansion of our Caesars Sportsbook retail locations, our World Series of Poker franchise, our William Hill legacy brand, and partnerships with the biggest names in sports and entertainment, we’re creating new and exciting opportunities for you to be a part of our empire and make an impact. Interested in joining the team? Check out our job postings and see what we have to offer, people. And remember—We Are All Caesars!

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 822
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

eGaming Consulting

NO. 12, Tigne Place,, Sliema, 3137, MT
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 800 and 849

eGaming Consulting (EGC) was established in 2009. The founders come from roles within successful online gaming operators, both European and US facing. EGC was formed with the goal of offering quality Marketing, Design & Development, SEO / SEM Services, Customer Acquisition, Social Media Consultancy and Operational Management to new start-ups as well as established brands in the online betting and gaming industry.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/caesarssportsbookandcasino.jpeg
Caesars Sportsbook & Casino
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/egaming-consulting.jpeg
eGaming Consulting
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Caesars Sportsbook & Casino
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
eGaming Consulting
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Caesars Sportsbook & Casino in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for eGaming Consulting in 2025.

Incident History — Caesars Sportsbook & Casino (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Caesars Sportsbook & Casino cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — eGaming Consulting (X = Date, Y = Severity)

eGaming Consulting cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/caesarssportsbookandcasino.jpeg
Caesars Sportsbook & Casino
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/egaming-consulting.jpeg
eGaming Consulting
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

eGaming Consulting company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Caesars Sportsbook & Casino company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, eGaming Consulting company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Caesars Sportsbook & Casino company.

In the current year, eGaming Consulting company and Caesars Sportsbook & Casino company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither eGaming Consulting company nor Caesars Sportsbook & Casino company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither eGaming Consulting company nor Caesars Sportsbook & Casino company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither eGaming Consulting company nor Caesars Sportsbook & Casino company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Caesars Sportsbook & Casino company nor eGaming Consulting company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Caesars Sportsbook & Casino nor eGaming Consulting holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Caesars Sportsbook & Casino company nor eGaming Consulting company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Caesars Sportsbook & Casino company employs more people globally than eGaming Consulting company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Caesars Sportsbook & Casino nor eGaming Consulting holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Caesars Sportsbook & Casino nor eGaming Consulting holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Caesars Sportsbook & Casino nor eGaming Consulting holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Caesars Sportsbook & Casino nor eGaming Consulting holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Caesars Sportsbook & Casino nor eGaming Consulting holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Caesars Sportsbook & Casino nor eGaming Consulting holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H