Comparison Overview

Caesars Interactive Entertainment Inc.

VS

Resorts Casino Tunica

Caesars Interactive Entertainment Inc.

One Caesars Palace Dr., Palace Executive Tower (WSOP), Las Vegas, Nevada, US, 89109
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Caesars Interactive Entertainment, Inc. (CIE) is the largest online, mobile and social gaming company focused on casino entertainment and is a subsidiary of Caesars Entertainment, the world’s largest gaming company. CIE owns the World Series of Poker (WSOP) and multiple social games developers all under its Playtika division. Games include Slotomania, Caesars Casino, Bingo Blitz and Bingo Rush. Partnerships with Microsoft and Electronic Arts include use of the WSOP brand in games for the Xbox platform, mobile devices and a WSOP-branded Facebook game. In addition, CIE licenses its brands in legal real money gaming jurisdictions, including in the United Kingdom, France and Italy. Our company employs more than 800 full-time employees and has offices in four countries on three continents. At Caesars Palace in Las Vegas, in Montreal, Canada, in Tel Aviv, Israel and in Beijing, China. It also houses development studios in Santa Monica, California, Minsk, Belarus and Kieve & Vinnitsa, Ukraine.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 146
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Resorts Casino Tunica

1100 CASINO STRIP BLVD, ROBINSONVILLE, Mississippi, 38664, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

A PROUD MARQUEE REWARDS CASINO At Resorts Casino Tunica, a spacious 35,000-square-foot casino floor filled with your favorite games is just the beginning of your premier gaming getaway. The casino stage lights up the night with the greatest tunes in town, while each of Resorts’ three restaurants fills you up with the best in burgers, steaks and buffet-style dining! And when you decide to call it a night, Resorts Casino Tunica has over 200 premier hotel rooms, so you can rest up for another action-packed day.

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 41
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/caesars-interactive-entertainment-inc-.jpeg
Caesars Interactive Entertainment Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/resorts-casino-tunica.jpeg
Resorts Casino Tunica
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Caesars Interactive Entertainment Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Resorts Casino Tunica
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Caesars Interactive Entertainment Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Resorts Casino Tunica in 2025.

Incident History — Caesars Interactive Entertainment Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Caesars Interactive Entertainment Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Resorts Casino Tunica (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Resorts Casino Tunica cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/caesars-interactive-entertainment-inc-.jpeg
Caesars Interactive Entertainment Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/resorts-casino-tunica.jpeg
Resorts Casino Tunica
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Resorts Casino Tunica company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Caesars Interactive Entertainment Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Resorts Casino Tunica company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Caesars Interactive Entertainment Inc. company.

In the current year, Resorts Casino Tunica company and Caesars Interactive Entertainment Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Resorts Casino Tunica company nor Caesars Interactive Entertainment Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Resorts Casino Tunica company nor Caesars Interactive Entertainment Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Resorts Casino Tunica company nor Caesars Interactive Entertainment Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Caesars Interactive Entertainment Inc. company nor Resorts Casino Tunica company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Caesars Interactive Entertainment Inc. nor Resorts Casino Tunica holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Resorts Casino Tunica company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Caesars Interactive Entertainment Inc. company.

Caesars Interactive Entertainment Inc. company employs more people globally than Resorts Casino Tunica company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Caesars Interactive Entertainment Inc. nor Resorts Casino Tunica holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Caesars Interactive Entertainment Inc. nor Resorts Casino Tunica holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Caesars Interactive Entertainment Inc. nor Resorts Casino Tunica holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Caesars Interactive Entertainment Inc. nor Resorts Casino Tunica holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Caesars Interactive Entertainment Inc. nor Resorts Casino Tunica holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Caesars Interactive Entertainment Inc. nor Resorts Casino Tunica holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H