Comparison Overview

CAD Railway Industries Ltd.

VS

Quality Steel Fabricators, Inc.

CAD Railway Industries Ltd.

155 Montreal-Toronto Highway, Lachine, Québec, H8S 1B4, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

CAD Railway Industries: Leading the Future of Rail Transportation === With over 45 years of excellence, CAD Railway Industries has established itself as a leader in the rail sector. Based in Lachine, Quebec, we specialize in delivering comprehensive repair and refurbishment services for locomotives, freight cars, passenger cars, and diesel engines. Our work ensures long-lasting performance, extending the life of rail assets by up to 20 years. CAD has grown and expanded its business from coast to coast in the past decade. In 2017, CAD strengthened its national reach by acquiring Calgary-based Caltrax Inc., Western Canada’s only independent rail repair services provider with already 3 locations. In 2020, CAD Rail reached a 23-Year agreement for Rail Fleet Maintenance with ONxpress Operations Inc, solidifying its expertise in rolling stock repair capabilities. With 450 skilled employees and facilities strategically located across Canada, CAD Railway Industries is your trusted partner in maintaining rail transportation's safety, efficiency, and sustainability—keeping the industry on track for the future.

NAICS: 336
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 345
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Quality Steel Fabricators, Inc.

85210, US
Last Update:

We are a newly established company that caters to clientele in the USA, Canada, and Mexico. We do custom made products as well as common products like pipes, nuts, screws, bolts, etc. We only use high quality, durable, and inexpensive fabricated steel. Our base in Malaysia has over 15 years of experience with established clients in Asia, Australia, and Europe. Now we, here in Mesa, Arizona are ready to serve our clients on this side of the globe.

NAICS: 3365
NAICS Definition: Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cad-railway-industries-ltd..jpeg
CAD Railway Industries Ltd.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Quality Steel Fabricators, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CAD Railway Industries Ltd.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Quality Steel Fabricators, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CAD Railway Industries Ltd. in 2025.

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Quality Steel Fabricators, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — CAD Railway Industries Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CAD Railway Industries Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Quality Steel Fabricators, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Quality Steel Fabricators, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cad-railway-industries-ltd..jpeg
CAD Railway Industries Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Quality Steel Fabricators, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Quality Steel Fabricators, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CAD Railway Industries Ltd. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Quality Steel Fabricators, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CAD Railway Industries Ltd. company.

In the current year, Quality Steel Fabricators, Inc. company and CAD Railway Industries Ltd. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Quality Steel Fabricators, Inc. company nor CAD Railway Industries Ltd. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Quality Steel Fabricators, Inc. company nor CAD Railway Industries Ltd. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Quality Steel Fabricators, Inc. company nor CAD Railway Industries Ltd. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CAD Railway Industries Ltd. company nor Quality Steel Fabricators, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CAD Railway Industries Ltd. nor Quality Steel Fabricators, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CAD Railway Industries Ltd. company nor Quality Steel Fabricators, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CAD Railway Industries Ltd. company employs more people globally than Quality Steel Fabricators, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Railroad Equipment Manufacturing.

Neither CAD Railway Industries Ltd. nor Quality Steel Fabricators, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CAD Railway Industries Ltd. nor Quality Steel Fabricators, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CAD Railway Industries Ltd. nor Quality Steel Fabricators, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CAD Railway Industries Ltd. nor Quality Steel Fabricators, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CAD Railway Industries Ltd. nor Quality Steel Fabricators, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CAD Railway Industries Ltd. nor Quality Steel Fabricators, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H