Comparison Overview

C.A.C. Industries, Inc.

VS

Egis in ANZ

C.A.C. Industries, Inc.

54-08 Vernon Blvd., Long Island City, New York, 11101, US
Last Update: 2025-03-05 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

C.A.C. Industries, Inc. is a well-established New York City-based heavy civil contractor with a reputation for completing challenging projects on schedule, under budget, and with superior workmanship. Throughout our decades of experience, C.A.C. has established the expertise to complete a wide range of projects, including: โ€ข Water Distribution Systems โ€ข Storm & Sanitary Sewer Systems โ€ข Roadway Reconstruction โ€ข Transportation & Related Facilities โ€ข Bridge Rehabilitation โ€ข Utilities โ€ข Heavy Civil Infrastructure C.A.C. regularly completes these types of essential infrastructure projects for public agencies as well as privately held companies with a goal of consistently exceeding our clientsโ€™ expectations. This experience, as well as our growing loyal workforce, substantial equipment inventory, and strong relationships with our strategic partners, have all contributed to fueling our growth over the last thirty years, and continue to propel us forward as leaders in the industry. As C.A.C. Industries, Inc. continues to grow, we remain committed to honoring our four Core Values; Itโ€™s Always We, Be Humble & Kick Ass, Be Green & Lean, and Educate to Transform. It is the emphasis on these values that creates a unique company culture in which employees are routinely recognized for their commitment to their team, their clients, and the environment. We believe that our commitment to our values while completing challenging projects is the key to constructing a better tomorrow.

NAICS: 237
NAICS Definition: Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees: 92
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Egis in ANZ

530 Collins St Level 18 Melbourne, Victoria 3000, AU
Last Update: 2025-05-02 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Egis is an international player active in architecture, consulting, construction engineering and mobility services. We create and operate intelligent infrastructures and buildings that respond to the climate emergency and contribute to more balanced, sustainable and resilient territorial development. Operating in 100 countries, Egis puts the expertise of its 19,500 employees at the service of its clients and develops cutting-edge innovations accessible to all projects. Through its wide range of activities, Egis is a key player in the collective organisation of society and the living environment of citizens all over the world In ANZ, we partner with our clients and the community to create Joyful Connected Cities every day. Through our expertise in Advisory, Architecture, Engineering Design and Infrastructure Management, we are tackling some of the biggest infrastructure and environmental challenges we face to build a more balanced, sustainable and resilient world. Improving peopleโ€šร„รดs quality of life and supporting communities in their social and economic development, whilst drastically reducing carbon emissions and achieving vital 2050 net zero targets, thatโ€šร„รดs our purpose. #WeAreAllEgis #ImpactTheFuture

NAICS: 237
NAICS Definition: Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cac-industries-inc.jpeg
C.A.C. Industries, Inc.
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indec-consulting.jpeg
Egis in ANZ
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
C.A.C. Industries, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Egis in ANZ
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for C.A.C. Industries, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Egis in ANZ in 2025.

Incident History โ€” C.A.C. Industries, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

C.A.C. Industries, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Egis in ANZ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Egis in ANZ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cac-industries-inc.jpeg
C.A.C. Industries, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indec-consulting.jpeg
Egis in ANZ
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both C.A.C. Industries, Inc. company and Egis in ANZ company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Egis in ANZ company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to C.A.C. Industries, Inc. company.

In the current year, Egis in ANZ company and C.A.C. Industries, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Egis in ANZ company nor C.A.C. Industries, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Egis in ANZ company nor C.A.C. Industries, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Egis in ANZ company nor C.A.C. Industries, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither C.A.C. Industries, Inc. company nor Egis in ANZ company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither C.A.C. Industries, Inc. company nor Egis in ANZ company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

C.A.C. Industries, Inc. company employs more people globally than Egis in ANZ company, reflecting its scale as a Civil Engineering.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Protection Against Voltage and Clock Glitches in FPGA devices, could allow an attacker with physical access to undervolt the platform resulting in a loss of confidentiality.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Malicious code was inserted into the Nx (build system) package and several related plugins. The tampered package was published to the npm software registry, via a supply-chain attack. Affected versions contain code that scans the file system, collects credentials, and posts them to GitHub as a repo under user's accounts.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In versions from 2.1.0 to before 2.3.0, the API endpoint GET /api/problems/:id returns challenge hints in plaintext within the question object, regardless of whether the user has unlocked them via point deduction. Users can view all hints for free, undermining the business logic of the platform and reducing the integrity of the challenge system. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In version 2.1.0, the /api/admin/assign-badge endpoint lacks proper access control, allowing any authenticated user to assign high-privilege badges (e.g., Staff) to themselves. This could lead to privilege escalation and impersonation of administrative roles. This issue has been patched in version 2.2.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

parse is a package designed to parse JavaScript SDK. A Prototype Pollution vulnerability in the SingleInstanceStateController.initializeState function of parse version 5.3.0 and before allows attackers to inject properties on Object.prototype via supplying a crafted payload, causing denial of service (DoS) as the minimum consequence.