Comparison Overview

Cabinets 2000 Inc

VS

RGE

Cabinets 2000 Inc

11100 Firestone Blvd, Norwalk, CA, US, 90650
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 650 and 699

None

NAICS: 322
NAICS Definition: Paper Manufacturing
Employees: 40
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

RGE

80 Raffles Place, Singapore, Singapore, 048624, SG
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Headquartered in Singapore, RGE is a global group of companies in the bio-based resources and energy sectors, serving over 100 markets worldwide. With more than US$35 billion in assets and a workforce of 80,000 employees, our operations span across Indonesia, China, Brazil, Canada, Spain, and Malaysia. As a global leader in sustainable natural fibres, edible oils, green packaging, and cleaner energy solutions, we play a vital role in feeding, clothing, and improving the lives of billions every day. We build lasting businesses by integrating sustainability as an enabler of growth, while advancing a nature-positive, greener future. Established in 1973, we have remained committed to sustainable development, conservation, and community empowerment, guided by our 5Cs philosophy of doing what is good for the Community, Country, Climate, Customer, and only then will it be good for the Company.

NAICS: 322
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 19,466
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Cabinets 2000 Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rgegroup.jpeg
RGE
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cabinets 2000 Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
RGE
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Paper and Forest Product Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cabinets 2000 Inc in 2026.

Incidents vs Paper and Forest Product Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RGE in 2026.

Incident History — Cabinets 2000 Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cabinets 2000 Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — RGE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RGE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Cabinets 2000 Inc
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Computer Virus (Ransomware)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rgegroup.jpeg
RGE
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

RGE company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cabinets 2000 Inc company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Cabinets 2000 Inc company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas RGE company has not reported any.

In the current year, RGE company and Cabinets 2000 Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Cabinets 2000 Inc company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while RGE company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither RGE company nor Cabinets 2000 Inc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither RGE company nor Cabinets 2000 Inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cabinets 2000 Inc company nor RGE company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cabinets 2000 Inc nor RGE holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

RGE company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Cabinets 2000 Inc company.

RGE company employs more people globally than Cabinets 2000 Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Paper and Forest Product Manufacturing.

Neither Cabinets 2000 Inc nor RGE holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cabinets 2000 Inc nor RGE holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cabinets 2000 Inc nor RGE holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cabinets 2000 Inc nor RGE holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cabinets 2000 Inc nor RGE holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cabinets 2000 Inc nor RGE holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N