Comparison Overview

Cabinet Gelber Liverman

VS

Immigrant Defense Project

Cabinet Gelber Liverman

189 Hymus Blvd, Pointe-Claire, Québec, H9R 1E9, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Cabinet Gelber Liverman est un cabinet d’avocats de Montréal composé de plusieurs avocats d’experience en litige. M. F S Liverman est un avocat plaidant principal et est l’un des avocats plaidants par excellence à Montréal. Si vous souhaitez avoir de plus amples conseils au-delà de l’information offerte sur ce site, n’hésitez pas à appeler et prendre rendez-vous. // Cabinet Gelber Liverman is a Montreal based law firm comprised of several litigation lawyers. Mr. F.S. Liverman is the firm's senior trial lawyer. With many years of practice, our lawyers offer incomparable service and expertise for anyone concerned with how they will be represented in the court. Our team of lawyers and paralegals work for you to always obtain the best results. If you would like more information on our company or legal services please do not hesitate to call us.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Immigrant Defense Project

28 W 39th St, New York, NY 10018, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

The Immigrant Defense Project promotes fundamental fairness for immigrants accused or convicted of crimes. We seek to minimize the harsh and disproportionate immigration consequences of contact with the criminal justice system by 1) working to transform unjust deportation laws and policies and 2) educating and advising immigrants, their criminal defenders, and other advocates.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cabinet-gelber-liverman.jpeg
Cabinet Gelber Liverman
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/immigrant-defense-project.jpeg
Immigrant Defense Project
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cabinet Gelber Liverman
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Immigrant Defense Project
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cabinet Gelber Liverman in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Immigrant Defense Project in 2025.

Incident History — Cabinet Gelber Liverman (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cabinet Gelber Liverman cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Immigrant Defense Project (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Immigrant Defense Project cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cabinet-gelber-liverman.jpeg
Cabinet Gelber Liverman
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/immigrant-defense-project.jpeg
Immigrant Defense Project
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cabinet Gelber Liverman company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Immigrant Defense Project company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Immigrant Defense Project company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cabinet Gelber Liverman company.

In the current year, Immigrant Defense Project company and Cabinet Gelber Liverman company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Immigrant Defense Project company nor Cabinet Gelber Liverman company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Immigrant Defense Project company nor Cabinet Gelber Liverman company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Immigrant Defense Project company nor Cabinet Gelber Liverman company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cabinet Gelber Liverman company nor Immigrant Defense Project company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cabinet Gelber Liverman nor Immigrant Defense Project holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cabinet Gelber Liverman company nor Immigrant Defense Project company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Immigrant Defense Project company employs more people globally than Cabinet Gelber Liverman company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Cabinet Gelber Liverman nor Immigrant Defense Project holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cabinet Gelber Liverman nor Immigrant Defense Project holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cabinet Gelber Liverman nor Immigrant Defense Project holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cabinet Gelber Liverman nor Immigrant Defense Project holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cabinet Gelber Liverman nor Immigrant Defense Project holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cabinet Gelber Liverman nor Immigrant Defense Project holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X