Comparison Overview

C2C

VS

Comnet

C2C

1 bis rue du Meunier, ROISSY EN FRANCE, FR, 95700
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

C2C est un intégrateur spécialisé dans les systèmes de communication Réseau IP couvrant les domaines des Infrastructures de câblage, le Wireless, les solutions de Vidéo Protection et Contrôle d’Accès. Depuis 1996, C2C maintient et développe ses compétences avec un suivi permanent de l’évolution des débits, des protocoles de communication, des normes et une action de veille technologique qui nous permettent de vous conseiller sur les solutions les plus innovantes.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 141
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Comnet

3 Corporate Drive, Danbury, Connecticut, US, CT06810
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

At Comnet, we solve complex industrial communication problems to keep operations up and running. As the unseen backbone of connected infrastructure, we deliver critical data securely, reliably, and when it matters most. We specialize in high-performance communication solutions for sectors where failure isn’t an option: transportation, security, manufacturing, and power. Our comprehensive product lineup includes: -Ethernet Switches -Media Converters -Network Monitoring & Management Software -Supporting Infrastructure We prioritize cybersecurity at every level—so you don’t have to choose between connectivity and protection. We are a trusted part of your entire networks defense strategy. By ensuring our devices are fully secure, you know that Comnet will not expose any weak point into your network. Comnet’s products are designed, built, and tested in the USA with limited lifetime warranties and global support. We’re proud to be the company customers and partners rely on because we build more than networks. We build the trusted connections that power industries forward.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 73
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/c2c.jpeg
C2C
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/comnet-industrial-networking.jpeg
Comnet
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
C2C
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Comnet
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for C2C in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Comnet in 2025.

Incident History — C2C (X = Date, Y = Severity)

C2C cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Comnet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Comnet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/c2c.jpeg
C2C
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/comnet-industrial-networking.jpeg
Comnet
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

C2C company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Comnet company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Comnet company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to C2C company.

In the current year, Comnet company and C2C company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Comnet company nor C2C company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Comnet company nor C2C company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Comnet company nor C2C company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither C2C company nor Comnet company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither C2C nor Comnet holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither C2C company nor Comnet company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

C2C company employs more people globally than Comnet company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither C2C nor Comnet holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither C2C nor Comnet holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither C2C nor Comnet holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither C2C nor Comnet holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither C2C nor Comnet holds HIPAA certification.

Neither C2C nor Comnet holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.