Comparison Overview

C and T Counseling, LLC

VS

NAMI Santa Clara County

C and T Counseling, LLC

3417 Canton Rd, Marietta, 30066, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://candtcounseling.com

C and T Counseling is dedicated to supporting individuals, couples, and families on their journey toward emotional wellness and personal advancement. Our agency offers a wide range of therapeutic services designed to address mental health challenges, life transitions, and relational issues in a safe, confidential, and supportive environment. With a team of experienced counselors, we use evidence-based approaches to empower our clients, foster resilience, and promote long-lasting positive change. At C and T Counseling, we believe in the transformative power of therapy and are committed to helping every client thrive.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

NAMI Santa Clara County

1150 S Bascom Ave San Jose, Ca 95128, San Jose, California, 95131, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.namisantaclara.org

NAMI Santa Clara County offers practical experience, support, education, comfort and understanding to anyone concerned about mental illnesses and their treatment in Santa Clara County. In addition, we work with public organizations, private businesses and the media to increase organizational and personal knowledge of effective ways of treating the illnesses while advocating for increased research and improved services for individuals with mental illness.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/c&t-counseling-llc.jpeg
C and T Counseling, LLC
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nami-santa-clara-county.jpeg
NAMI Santa Clara County
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
C and T Counseling, LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NAMI Santa Clara County
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for C and T Counseling, LLC in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NAMI Santa Clara County in 2026.

Incident History — C and T Counseling, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

C and T Counseling, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NAMI Santa Clara County (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NAMI Santa Clara County cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/c&t-counseling-llc.jpeg
C and T Counseling, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nami-santa-clara-county.jpeg
NAMI Santa Clara County
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both C and T Counseling, LLC company and NAMI Santa Clara County company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, NAMI Santa Clara County company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to C and T Counseling, LLC company.

In the current year, NAMI Santa Clara County company and C and T Counseling, LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither NAMI Santa Clara County company nor C and T Counseling, LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither NAMI Santa Clara County company nor C and T Counseling, LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither NAMI Santa Clara County company nor C and T Counseling, LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither C and T Counseling, LLC company nor NAMI Santa Clara County company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither C and T Counseling, LLC nor NAMI Santa Clara County holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither C and T Counseling, LLC company nor NAMI Santa Clara County company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

NAMI Santa Clara County company employs more people globally than C and T Counseling, LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither C and T Counseling, LLC nor NAMI Santa Clara County holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither C and T Counseling, LLC nor NAMI Santa Clara County holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither C and T Counseling, LLC nor NAMI Santa Clara County holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither C and T Counseling, LLC nor NAMI Santa Clara County holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither C and T Counseling, LLC nor NAMI Santa Clara County holds HIPAA certification.

Neither C and T Counseling, LLC nor NAMI Santa Clara County holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References