Comparison Overview

C&D Printing - A BR Company

VS

KNP

C&D Printing - A BR Company

550 E 76th Ave, Denver, Colorado, 80229, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cdprinting.net/

C&D Printing, an accredited Union Print Shop, has over 30 years of expertise in utilizing innovative print methods to bring your message to the hands of millions of existing and new customers. We strive to build lasting relationships with our customers by providing excellent service and producing quality products at an economic price. By communicating with you every step of the way, we enhance quality control and a positive experience from concept to completion. With our Environmental Leadership Award for 2016-2017, we are thrilled to diversify our value to the community and our clients.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

KNP

Lamdin Road, None, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, GB, IP32 6NU
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 0 and 549
http://www.knplitho.co.uk/

Today more than ever, print is key in engaging targeted audiences who find it easy to ignore digital communications. From beautifully crafted Direct Mail pieces to brochures, magazines, invitations, prospectuses and vouchers, print is integral to business. At KNP we’ve spent over 30 years helping clients reach their target audiences through integrated printing and mailing solutions. We understand the importance of getting something ‘just right’. And we know you need a print partner you can trust, so we deliver what we say we will, when we say we will, and how we say we will. Always on hand to give advice and deliver the right solution, we’ve built a reputation for outstanding quality and reliability. And with everything on site, we provide a cost-effective, no hidden extras solution. Our services: Litho & Digital Print, Direct Mail, Specialised Finishing, Large Format, Signage. Say hello! 01284 715296 knplitho.co.uk

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/c&d-printing-inc-.jpeg
C&D Printing - A BR Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/knp-litho.jpeg
KNP
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
C&D Printing - A BR Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
KNP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for C&D Printing - A BR Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

KNP has 0.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — C&D Printing - A BR Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

C&D Printing - A BR Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — KNP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KNP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/c&d-printing-inc-.jpeg
C&D Printing - A BR Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/knp-litho.jpeg
KNP
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Weak/Compromised Password, Social Engineering (Blagging/Tricking IT Helpdesk - in case of M&S)
Motivation: Financial gain (ransom demand)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

C&D Printing - A BR Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to KNP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

KNP company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas C&D Printing - A BR Company company has not reported any.

In the current year, KNP company has reported more cyber incidents than C&D Printing - A BR Company company.

KNP company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while C&D Printing - A BR Company company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither KNP company nor C&D Printing - A BR Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither KNP company nor C&D Printing - A BR Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither C&D Printing - A BR Company company nor KNP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither C&D Printing - A BR Company nor KNP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

C&D Printing - A BR Company company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to KNP company.

KNP company employs more people globally than C&D Printing - A BR Company company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither C&D Printing - A BR Company nor KNP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither C&D Printing - A BR Company nor KNP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither C&D Printing - A BR Company nor KNP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither C&D Printing - A BR Company nor KNP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither C&D Printing - A BR Company nor KNP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither C&D Printing - A BR Company nor KNP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References