Comparison Overview

Bwell Norge AS

VS

Hunter Health

Bwell Norge AS

Martin Linges vei 25, Fornebu, 1364, NO
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Bwell jobber for å redusere stress og tretthet på jobben. Målet er økt aktivitet og lønnsomhet i bedriften. * Bwell Pausen – kombinasjon av massasje og mental trening * Bwell Kontormølle – tredemølle for kontorplassen * Bwell Kompetanse – foredrag, kurs og coaching Vi ønsker en arbeidshverdag der medarbeidere og ledere er mindre slitne. En arbeidsplass hvor ansatte mestrer stress og naturlig press. En hverdag med mer energi og overskudd og mindre fravær og sykdom. Dette kommer hvis vi setter av tid til å hente oss inn igjen. Tid til restitusjon. Bwell har utviklet helsefremmende verktøy basert på forskning og faglig dokumentasjon og i samarbeid med eksperter på området.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Hunter Health

2318 E Central Ave, None, Wichita, Kansas, US, None
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 650 and 699

Hunter Health is a full-service healthcare provider addressing the needs of our patients through medical, dental, behavioral health and health education services. Hunter Health has been offering affordable care to members of Sedgwick County and the surrounding communities since 1976. Hunter Health is the oldest Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) in Wichita, and the only Urban Indian Health Program in the state. We aim to make healthcare a better system for everyone, especially you and the people you love. We provide patient-centered services, meaning we care about each of our patients individually, and offer a tailored treatment plan that best fits their lifestyle and goals. We offer extended hours, same day appointments and provide instruction on how to meet your health care needs when our office is not open, giving you 24-hour access to medical care.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 131
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bwell.jpeg
Bwell Norge AS
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hunter-health-clinic.jpeg
Hunter Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bwell Norge AS
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hunter Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bwell Norge AS in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hunter Health in 2025.

Incident History — Bwell Norge AS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bwell Norge AS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hunter Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hunter Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bwell.jpeg
Bwell Norge AS
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hunter-health-clinic.jpeg
Hunter Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email Account Compromise
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Bwell Norge AS company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hunter Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Hunter Health company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Bwell Norge AS company has not reported any.

In the current year, Hunter Health company and Bwell Norge AS company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hunter Health company nor Bwell Norge AS company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Hunter Health company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Bwell Norge AS company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Hunter Health company nor Bwell Norge AS company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bwell Norge AS company nor Hunter Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bwell Norge AS nor Hunter Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bwell Norge AS company nor Hunter Health company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Hunter Health company employs more people globally than Bwell Norge AS company, reflecting its scale as a Health and Human Services.

Neither Bwell Norge AS nor Hunter Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bwell Norge AS nor Hunter Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bwell Norge AS nor Hunter Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bwell Norge AS nor Hunter Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bwell Norge AS nor Hunter Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bwell Norge AS nor Hunter Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H