Comparison Overview

BVDH Producties

VS

DPM

BVDH Producties

None
Last Update: 2025-12-18

Grafisch productie- en adviesbureau. Dankzij mijn ruime ervaring als projectmanager aan zowel klant- als bureauzijde ben ik in staat om mijn klanten te helpen met alle aspecten van de realisatie van grafische producties. Kort samengevat: mijn streven is het "ontzorgen" van klanten op het gebied van drukwerk. Door mijn uitgebreid netwerk van specialisten in te zetten vind ik op elke vraag wel een passend antwoord. U kunt mij voor elke drukwerk-vraag inschakelen: van visitekaartjes tot huis-aan-huis krantjes, mailings, banners, billboards en abri's, brochures, folders en flyers, posters, mailings, handing, etc. Als het om drukwerk gaat, kan ik u helpen.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

DPM

Unit 1 Churchill Business Park, Westerham, Kent, TN16 1BT, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Our philosophy: DPM’s company philosophy is based on quality, integrity and above all, honesty. We don’t believe in false economy when we are buying or selling. We pay a fair price for our equipment and expect a fair price when selling, no more no less. At DPM we are not interested in the short term, our aim is to be recognised as the best and this can only be achieved by conducting successful business over a long period. Honesty can only be judged by familiarity, therefore we are happy to provide you with a list of our clients and let you decide if you want to deal with us. How we work: Our experienced sales team have close contact with many companies worldwide meaning we are often the first to hear of equipment when it becomes available. We use a purpose-built computer system developed to search and locate equipment within minutes of receiving your enquiry. This system is updated hourly with new equipment for sale and currently has over 20,000 items available worldwide.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 394
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bvdh-producties.jpeg
BVDH Producties
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dpm.jpeg
DPM
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BVDH Producties
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DPM
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BVDH Producties in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DPM in 2025.

Incident History — BVDH Producties (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BVDH Producties cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — DPM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DPM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bvdh-producties.jpeg
BVDH Producties
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dpm.jpeg
DPM
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

BVDH Producties company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to DPM company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, DPM company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to BVDH Producties company.

In the current year, DPM company and BVDH Producties company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither DPM company nor BVDH Producties company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither DPM company nor BVDH Producties company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither DPM company nor BVDH Producties company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither BVDH Producties company nor DPM company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither BVDH Producties nor DPM holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither BVDH Producties company nor DPM company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

DPM company employs more people globally than BVDH Producties company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither BVDH Producties nor DPM holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BVDH Producties nor DPM holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BVDH Producties nor DPM holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BVDH Producties nor DPM holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BVDH Producties nor DPM holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BVDH Producties nor DPM holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L