Comparison Overview

Buying Legal Council

VS

CRC Salomon, Inc.

Buying Legal Council

New York, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Our mission is to advance the field of legal services and legal technology, enhance the value and performance of legal procurement practitioners and their organizations, foster dialogue between buyers and sellers, and document and promote best practices. We identify and provide solutions to both strategic and operational challenges our members face and prepare them for tomorrow’s opportunities and challenges. The Buying Legal Council facilitates an innovative dialogue between buyers and sellers of legal services, as well as other stakeholders in the legal market.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CRC Salomon, Inc.

2201 Old Court Road, Baltimore, Maryland, 21208, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

CRC Salomon provides a full line of convenient 24/7 court reporting and other litigation services to the legal profession, government, schools, and businesses. We have no geographic limits. We can operate anywhere in the country, or the world, directly, remotely or through our network of qualified court reporting firms. We have the latest remote deposition technology that allows anyone to attend any deposition from anywhere with an internet connection. Attorneys can use their iPads, mobile devices, and laptops instead of having to travel. CRC Salomon has a history of providing quality work dating back to 1898. Our longevity is based on professionalism at every level of the organization that ensures your work is done right and on time.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 45
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crc-salomon-inc..jpeg
CRC Salomon, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Buying Legal Council
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CRC Salomon, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Buying Legal Council in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CRC Salomon, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Buying Legal Council (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Buying Legal Council cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CRC Salomon, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CRC Salomon, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/buying-legal-council.jpeg
Buying Legal Council
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crc-salomon-inc..jpeg
CRC Salomon, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CRC Salomon, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Buying Legal Council company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CRC Salomon, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Buying Legal Council company.

In the current year, CRC Salomon, Inc. company and Buying Legal Council company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CRC Salomon, Inc. company nor Buying Legal Council company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CRC Salomon, Inc. company nor Buying Legal Council company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CRC Salomon, Inc. company nor Buying Legal Council company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Buying Legal Council company nor CRC Salomon, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Buying Legal Council nor CRC Salomon, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Buying Legal Council company nor CRC Salomon, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CRC Salomon, Inc. company employs more people globally than Buying Legal Council company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Buying Legal Council nor CRC Salomon, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Buying Legal Council nor CRC Salomon, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Buying Legal Council nor CRC Salomon, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Buying Legal Council nor CRC Salomon, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Buying Legal Council nor CRC Salomon, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Buying Legal Council nor CRC Salomon, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X