Comparison Overview

Butler Engineering

VS

Accurate Pattern, Inc.

Butler Engineering

1/11 Adrienne St, Raglan, 2795, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Butler Engineering's primary industry is industrial spare parts manufacturing, We currently service a huge range of industries including food production, mining, defence, agriculture, power generation, forestry, construction and rail. We pride ourselves in manufacturing the difficult jobs that most other engineering firms will shy away from. Specifically extrusion dies, moulds, and press dies for the food industry, defense prototypes, specialised packaging and product handling equipment, robotics hardware, fixtures and jigs. We also offer a drafting and analysis service where we can measure, draft, analize original materials, and provide options to improve part service life or efficiency. Butler Engineering was founded in 1978 and has built a reputation throughout Australia for precision machining and reliability. Our company goal is to achieve excellence in machining quality, service and delivery, while improving our facility to create a workshop with the highest level of safety and efficiency. Central West NSW, Precision Machining, Precision Engineering, Precision Engineers, Bathurst, CNC machinists.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Accurate Pattern, Inc.

12833 West Glendale Avenue, Butler, WI, 53007, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Accurate Pattern Inc. solves complex tooling needs and improves upon patterns, plugs, fixtures, and gauges by putting the customer-defined desire for quality first. We support engineering teams in carrying out their most intricate and involved design needs. Some of our customers include Tier 1 Automotive Suppliers, Aerospace manufacturers, Custom Car Manufacturers, Fiberglass molders, Thermoformers, Foundries, Inventors, Investors, and others. We define success when our customer’s most challenging design needs are met.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/butler-engineering.jpeg
Butler Engineering
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/accurate-pattern-inc..jpeg
Accurate Pattern, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Butler Engineering
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Accurate Pattern, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Butler Engineering in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Accurate Pattern, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Butler Engineering (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Butler Engineering cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Accurate Pattern, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Accurate Pattern, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/butler-engineering.jpeg
Butler Engineering
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/accurate-pattern-inc..jpeg
Accurate Pattern, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Accurate Pattern, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Butler Engineering company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Accurate Pattern, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Butler Engineering company.

In the current year, Accurate Pattern, Inc. company and Butler Engineering company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Accurate Pattern, Inc. company nor Butler Engineering company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Accurate Pattern, Inc. company nor Butler Engineering company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Accurate Pattern, Inc. company nor Butler Engineering company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Butler Engineering company nor Accurate Pattern, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Butler Engineering nor Accurate Pattern, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Butler Engineering company nor Accurate Pattern, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Accurate Pattern, Inc. company employs more people globally than Butler Engineering company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Butler Engineering nor Accurate Pattern, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Butler Engineering nor Accurate Pattern, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Butler Engineering nor Accurate Pattern, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Butler Engineering nor Accurate Pattern, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Butler Engineering nor Accurate Pattern, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Butler Engineering nor Accurate Pattern, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H