Comparison Overview

Butcher & Barlow

VS

The Gary Law Group

Butcher & Barlow

2-6 Bank Street, Bury, Lancashire, BL9 0DL, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Approachable, open and client-focused, at Butcher & Barlow we pride ourselves on building long-term relationships with our clients. Aiming to be seen as an extension of your business, or a life-long friend, our team of experts are here whenever you need us and at whatever stage of life you are at. With twelve offices across the North West and 170 dedicated and experienced staff, we are here to guide you through the complexities of life and share the load when it comes to making big decisions. Whether you are buying your first house or looking to expand your business, Butcher & Barlow are here to listen, reassure, and collaboratively work with you to achieve your objectives and aims. We are Your Solicitors, for Life

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 141
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Gary Law Group

2000 One Main Place, Portland, Oregon, 97204, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The Gary Law Group provides all-inclusive legal representation and best practices consulting for manufacturers and sellers of windows, doors and skylights. For the last 20 years our knowledgeable and experienced lawyers have worked with clients in the fenestration markeplace to identify their issues and with our insight and expertise, guide our clients and implement a solution tailored to their needs. The Gary Law Group has successfully represented businesses from around the country that encounter product liability claims, and product specification claims in both the individual case and class action settings. Our 20 years of experience has afforded us the ability to anticipate issues before they arise, with that we are able to create a solid legal foundation for your company to eliminate unnecessary risk.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/butcher-&-barlow-solicitors-and-notaries.jpeg
Butcher & Barlow
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-gary-law-group.jpeg
The Gary Law Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Butcher & Barlow
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Gary Law Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Butcher & Barlow in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Gary Law Group in 2025.

Incident History — Butcher & Barlow (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Butcher & Barlow cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Gary Law Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Gary Law Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/butcher-&-barlow-solicitors-and-notaries.jpeg
Butcher & Barlow
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-gary-law-group.jpeg
The Gary Law Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Gary Law Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Butcher & Barlow company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Gary Law Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Butcher & Barlow company.

In the current year, The Gary Law Group company and Butcher & Barlow company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Gary Law Group company nor Butcher & Barlow company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Gary Law Group company nor Butcher & Barlow company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Gary Law Group company nor Butcher & Barlow company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Butcher & Barlow company nor The Gary Law Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Butcher & Barlow nor The Gary Law Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Butcher & Barlow company nor The Gary Law Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Butcher & Barlow company employs more people globally than The Gary Law Group company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Butcher & Barlow nor The Gary Law Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Butcher & Barlow nor The Gary Law Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Butcher & Barlow nor The Gary Law Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Butcher & Barlow nor The Gary Law Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Butcher & Barlow nor The Gary Law Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Butcher & Barlow nor The Gary Law Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X