Comparison Overview

Business Review

VS

Folio Literary Management

Business Review

Strada Stirbei Voda 58, Sector 1, 010104, RO
Last Update: 2025-11-26

With 25 years of experience, Business Review has truly become the platform Where Romania Talks Business, reaching both local and international audience, being the first English-language publication on the Romanian market. Each month Business Review magazine delivers news, reviews, research, comments and business analyzes by inspirational and high impact editorial content that will take your business to the next level. It is a must-read that focuses on all issues relevant to CEOs, business owners and executives of all types of companies. Monthly magazine | Online News | BR Daily newsletter | Special Supplements & Guides | Events

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 68
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Folio Literary Management

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Folio Literary Management is a leading full-service literary agency focused on cultivating original voices & passionate storytelling. Founded in 2006, Folio has become home to hundreds of bestsellers as well as multiple award nominees and winners across all categories. We are in the business of amplifying storytellers: to partner with fresh and incisive voices to help share their stories, create deeper connections with their audiences, and develop a long-term strategy to grow long-term value.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 58
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/business-review.jpeg
Business Review
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/folio-literary-management.jpeg
Folio Literary Management
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Business Review
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Folio Literary Management
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Business Review in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Folio Literary Management in 2025.

Incident History — Business Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Business Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Folio Literary Management (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Folio Literary Management cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/business-review.jpeg
Business Review
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/folio-literary-management.jpeg
Folio Literary Management
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Business Review company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Folio Literary Management company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Folio Literary Management company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Business Review company.

In the current year, Folio Literary Management company and Business Review company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Folio Literary Management company nor Business Review company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Folio Literary Management company nor Business Review company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Folio Literary Management company nor Business Review company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Business Review company nor Folio Literary Management company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Business Review nor Folio Literary Management holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Business Review company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Folio Literary Management company.

Business Review company employs more people globally than Folio Literary Management company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Business Review nor Folio Literary Management holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Business Review nor Folio Literary Management holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Business Review nor Folio Literary Management holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Business Review nor Folio Literary Management holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Business Review nor Folio Literary Management holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Business Review nor Folio Literary Management holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.